Sending that lass alone to London, to terrify her, and then not actually living in the real world, but with other sneering brain washed cult members, didn't feel fair. Why not send her to a small town or village, perhaps to do a year of college or something, dressed normally, mixing with normal teens? It was underhand. If they'd sent her to, yes, Canterbury, to do a year's course, and live with an evangelical Christian family, then she chose to return, I'd believe it was free choice. Making out she could choose between consumerist, secular, fast paced London, or what she'd only ever known, is wrong. If she was shown a Christian way of living with opportunities and equality, would she have returned to the constructions of the Bruderhof?
I also wonder who pulls the strings. Who is in charge, and who put them there? (And 100% the person in charge is male, obvs. Are there any women in leadership?)
What struck me was their perfect teeth! "Living in the past", yet obviously accessing modern dentistry!
The kids all knew what telly was. I couldn't work out whether they ever mix with normal children etc.
The man in charge clearly didn't like being asked why the women wore peasant clothes. And that poor worn down woman who said she understood now why the gender roles were needed, she sounded like an abuse victim.
It sounded idyllic for under twelves. But for teenagers, and especially women, so limiting.