This is something I’ve been pondering while obsessively rewatching Line Of Duty. Jed Mercurio admits that after each season has aired they look carefully at public reactions, what has worked and what hasn’t, and start the next season from there.
That basically means IMO they’re looking at what fans think is going to happen, and then they do something else, which is surely diluting any narrative integrity.
Now this isn’t actually spoilers, it’s just theories, but JM seems quite bothered that some fan somewhere may have guessed and therefore spoiled his endgame, and that’s directly impacting the narrative.
Even worse, I was reading about Avengers Endgame (no spoilers here please, none from me!) and the absolutely ludicrous way it was made - where actors were given only their scenes for that day, and all the other lines were redacted, and some actors have said that they don’t even know their own character’s arc in the film. How can an actor do the best possible job under those circumstances? It’s absolutely ridiculous.
While reading about that I spotted this article which I definitely agree with overall (spoilers for Sixth Sense included, just in case you really want to watch it but haven’t found time in the last couple of decades 😂)
www.vox.com/culture/2019/4/22/18412716/avengers-endgame-spoilers-game-of-thrones-spoilers-no-spoilers
What do other people think?