I agree that it would have been better at 90 minutes (at least!)
The Saif/Jonathan Andrews thing needed more going into. And the case of the other guy, I can't remember his name, who's being investigated regarding accusations by the woman he described as his 'best friend', seemed tacked on in the interests of balance but dealt with too briefly.
I'd also have liked to see the actual Title IX set-up and process itself looked into more. I am pretty uncomfortable with the existence of a second tier to the justice system, one run by 'specialist administrators' as the programme preview material had it (WTF does that mean?) and, as Saif's lawyer rightly said, whose procedures and decisions will never be made transparent to the public. It made me think of the stuff in the US constitution about a local 'militia' being allowed to mobilise to protect themselves – the stuff that gun fans use to justify themselves. It feels to me too much like vigilantism with a thin sheen of 'officialness' over the top.
On the docu itself, I thought it was fascinating how they set up Saif at first to look vulnerable and confused, then basically gave him rope to hang himself with. The stuff about 'oh really, actors can make themselves cry?' was laughable.
It was also interesting at the point where Louis discovered that Saif had researched him and watched all his programmes, and challenged him about it in his hotel room. I think that's the only time I've seen Louis look angry; in fact, he looked FURIOUS. He also looked furious, and disgusted, when he was driving Saif back from the investigation and Saif read out the 'Invictus' poem he'd started his self-defence with.
Molly Johnson spoke very clearly and persuasively about her experience. She was so impressive. I've read a review criticising the programme, and her interview specifically, but I thought Louis handled it really sensitively and just allowed her the space and airtime to speak.