Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

Vanity Fair

208 replies

JaneJeffer · 02/09/2018 21:19

I'm finding Rebecca annoying. I haven't read the book so have no idea if she's meant to be.

OP posts:
AndromedaPerseus · 03/09/2018 22:08

Silver though I can image Madonna and Becky Sharp are quite similar in character

SilverHairedCat · 03/09/2018 22:33

Becky is the epitomy of a material girl, but the song was totally out of keeping with the rest of the soundtrack.

Rafflesway · 03/09/2018 23:08

I am finding it really tedious and I am a mahoosive period drama fan. Confused

Pipsqueak11 · 03/09/2018 23:15

I love it! I like the change from the rather stuffy BBC1 period drama - loved the book and I feel this is doing it justice in getting Becky's chancer character across .

Pipsqueak11 · 03/09/2018 23:20

also loads better than the bodyguard nonsense - completely unbelievable . main 2 characters intensely irritating . middle aged highflying woman having a fling with a bit of rough who doesnt say anything but spends a lot of time staring into space in a not very meaningful way . Dull

JaneJeffer · 03/09/2018 23:23

I didn't bother watching it tonight. It just didn't grab me last night and I didn't care about any of the characters.

OP posts:
TheMadGardener · 03/09/2018 23:26

It seems to be the fashion now to put modern music in period dramas - the BBC did the same with Picnic at Hanging Rock. I find it jarring.

I'm sticking with Vanity Fair although many things about it annoy me. Becky''s supposed to have red/sandy hair and green eyes, just for starters. And I agree with the poster who said there should be much more of Thackeray commenting and giving the authorial asides.

On the plus side, I like anything with Simon Russell Beale and Matthew Bayton. And I think the actress playing Amelia is very well cast.

BitOutOfPractice · 03/09/2018 23:38

Another massive fan of the book and was optimistic given the cast list. But oh my goodness how I wish it was a bbc production. It just seems so cheaply done. I mean the Vauxhall scenes needed about 5 times as many extras. It looked half empty and the way they passed the various attractions one by one in set pieces was just cringey.

winegummms · 04/09/2018 07:53

I've not read the book but I'm enjoying the glossy entertainment, beautiful houses and costumes.

Confused by: Becky suddenly dealing with the Crawley estate legalities...

Becky's pointed looks to the camera when she's about to be devious - surely it can be more subtle and the viewer would still understand?

Material Girl track at the end of ep2. It seems a little bit forced!

Inkanta · 04/09/2018 15:51

"I think Becky is doing great tbh."

Yes I do.

Feel a bit sorry for the character so far. Admire her ballsy attitude despite her so called inferior status, and don't blame her exploiting her good looks. Not easy in those days.

The series seems a little low on budget but I'm enjoying it.

diddl · 04/09/2018 16:09

I can't find it anymore but there used to be a clip on youtube of Tom Ward as George, set to "dedicated follower of fashion".

Ginger1982 · 04/09/2018 16:14

Not a patch on the 1997/98 version with Philip Glenister as Dobbin (goes off to hunt for DVD)

DonkeysDontRideBicycles · 04/09/2018 16:16

It seems fresh and vibrant to me.
Tbh I was prepared to give it a go not really expecting much, but it won me over very quickly.

I was trying to remember the adaptation I really liked with Philip Glenister as a very believable Dobbin. 1998 it was filmed in - feels like it was only a few years ago.
1998? Noooo! Time flies!

Gruach · 04/09/2018 16:20

It’s helpful to read all this - I haven’t been sure what to think.

I was hoping that the sugary colouring would be underlining huge doses of irony, but (apart from Becky) none of the characters appear to have any self-awareness whatsoever. So it’s hard to see the point of them. (Have read VF but too long ago to remember how I felt about it.)

And what on Earth is going on with the make up and lighting? So many ivory necks and orange faces. And patchiness - as if they couldn’t find the right tools for application.

I liked the footman’s sideways looks - but in all other respects this version doesn’t seem to have moved costume drama on at all from twenty years ago. They really needed more commitment to Material Girl era music, too.

Unsatisfactory so far, though I cannot help feeling there must be something I’m missing.

user1457017537 · 04/09/2018 16:50

I watched on catch up and was very disappointed. I thought it was an amateur dramatics production, even the red uniforms looked like red felt with buttons and fringing stuck on. Very poor in my opinion

Ginger1982 · 04/09/2018 17:06

😍😍😍

midsomermurderess · 04/09/2018 18:26

I heard the woman who did the adaptation say 'it's all about friendship' which made my heart sink a little. Becky Sharpe is not likeable and Thackeray never disguises her true nature. She is, in modern parlance, a grifter, through and through. She, and her horrific husband, identify marks, suck them dry, discard them and move on without a backward glance. You are never invited to pity her (she certainly doesn't pity herself) or to like her. Even if she does something kind, it's expedient. He doesn't apologise, he doesn't sugar coat her behaviour. That in a way is the glory of the book, it's not enveloped in a cloying 19th century morality. I will have a look at it but I do wonder if it's all going to be a bit huggy and Austenish.

Snugglepiggy · 04/09/2018 19:03

Well that's me sorted.On the strength of that YouTube clip with Philjp Glennister thats the one for me.Just from that short taster the acting loooks far superior.Wont bother anymore with this version,already it's not living up to my expectations.I must confess I've not read the book,or seen other adaptations .Lots of Austen and Dickens but not Vanity Fair ,although I knew Becky Sharp was a much coveted role.

flowery · 04/09/2018 19:13

My favourite is still the 1987 version

StellaRockafella · 04/09/2018 19:16

I also agree that Dobbin hasn't been well cast, and both Philip Glennister and Rhys Ifans were more physically suited. Ditto Anthony Head's casting as Lord Steyne which is almost as ludicrous as Gabriel Bryne's.

Another issue I have with ITV's adaption is the cinematography and mise-en-scene. It's all too brightly light, and Queen's Crawley is far too sanitary and clean. As is Martin Clues as Sir Pitt. in fact, it just not grubby enough on any level.
I'm not a huge fan of Frances de la Tour but her Matilda Crawley is almost as grotesque enough. However, Miriam Margolyes in the BBC's version was bang on.

I always thought I was alone in my admiration for the BBC's version, so am thrilled to learn so many of you rate it highly too. And to those who haven't seen it, I urge you to seek it out, it really will be worth your while.

SilverHairedCat · 04/09/2018 19:28

Ah Dobbin 💕 and Philip Glenister too 💕💕

SchadenfreudePersonified · 04/09/2018 21:27

My word - that takes me back Flowery! When I think of poor (wet lettuce) Amelia sobbing because Becky has stolen from her, and yet still trying to defend her friend - that is the version that always comes to my mind., I have to admit.

SchadenfreudePersonified · 04/09/2018 21:29

However, Miriam Margolyes in the BBC's version was bang on

She was, wasn't she? I loved her in that role.

And wasn't Sir Pitt's elder son also called Pitt, not Bute?

SchadenfreudePersonified · 04/09/2018 21:30

I always thought I was alone in my admiration for the BBC's version, so am thrilled to learn so many of you rate it highly too. And to those who haven't seen it, I urge you to seek it out, it really will be worth your while.

Seconded.

As Rockerfella says - it is the dog's bollox superb! Perfectly cast, superbly acted, outstandingly adapted.

ScribblyGum · 04/09/2018 21:32

I don’t mind Martin Clunes in appearance, they’ve made him grubby enough for my liking, what they haven’t done is make him mean enough. I want to see really evil bastard Martin Clunes.

That scene with Becky being all lovely and fun with the two Miss Crawleys no no no NO NO. Why are they making her appear to have capacity for kindness. She doesn’t give a tiny shiny shit about them in the book, they are just another stepping stone on her climb upwards. Her indifference and corresponding neglect and cruelty of children are important elements to help understand her true nature.

Still enjoying it though, I'm easily pleased by anything period drama and perversely finding enormous pleasure chunnering away to dd1 in the advert breaks how “well it’s not like THAT in the book.”

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread