Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

Dispatches.....Getting Rich from the Housing Crisis.

40 replies

HelenaDove · 12/07/2018 19:39

Broadcast date...........Monday 16th July.

"The pay of some social housing bosses has hit record levels during the current housing crisis. For Dispatches Anthony Barnett visits communities under threat and asks why, in one of the poorest areas, a housing association executive received a pay out of more than a million pounds"

Synopsis from Radio Times.

OP posts:
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 13/08/2018 02:21

On Boxing Day last year, Sarah Henley and her partner were asleep alongside their eight-month-old baby Rudi when they were roused by cries. Water was pouring through the bedroom light fitting on to their son, soaking his cot and their bed. It was exactly two years since the couple had reported water leaks over a stairwell in the shared-ownership block managed by London & Quadrant (L&Q). They claim nothing was done and the leaks then spread to their flat in the four-year-old building.

“In August 2017 we came home to find water pouring through the ceiling on to our bed, which is fixed and can’t be moved, and my son’s cot,” says Henley, who lives in the London borough of Southwark. “I then discovered that a report had been made six months previously but no action had been taken.”

The family complained again and scaffolding was twice erected but removed without any repairs being done. In December, water began soaking their bedroom again and the family was forced to move into a hotel and then a series of Airbnb rentals.
Once the biggest housing associations own 90% of social homes, tenants will lose out
Colin Wiles
Read more

“Because nobody could give us a timeline we had to completely re-arrange all our plans for our baby’s first Christmas and keep moving between temporary accommodation until the flat was habitable again,” says Henley, who was forced to move three times over eight days. Six days after they moved back into their flat, the leaks resumed and they spent three weeks shifting between Airbnb rentals and friends’ flats

L&Q is one of the country’s largest and most prosperous housing associations, accommodating 250,000 people across London and the south-east in homes built with the help of tax-payer subsidies.
Advertisement

In spite of – or because of – its rapid expansion, residents on some estates say they have spent years complaining of substandard living conditions and have had lengthy battles over repairs. All 43 reviews on the TrustPilot website mention neglected repairs and unheeding customer services.

Lisa Askew, a social tenant, launched a petition in 2016 to force L&Q to take action after two years of damp, mould, cracks and vermin in her home in Welling, Kent, which affected the health of her baby daughter. L&Q eventually moved her to another estate where, she says, problems have continued.

“I’ve been to hell and back with L&Q. They took two years to repair a leaking water tank in the living room, and our house appears to be suffering from subsidence with huge cracks in the walls,” she says. “I tripped over defective floorboards I had complained about, causing a hairline crack in my knee and soft tissue damage, and had to wear a cast for 12 weeks. We’re trapped in a house we don’t feel safe in because we can’t afford to rent privately or own a home of our own.”

L&Q says that a structural engineer was sent in May and concluded that the cracks were due to thermal movement rather than subsidence. It agreed to appoint another surveyor for a second opinion

On Henley’s estate, leaks that damaged four flats have been fixed, but residents have reported frequent and long-lasting breaks in the supplies of hot water and heating over the four years since the estate was built.

This month, in the height of the heatwave, the water supply was disconnected for a day without warning while repairs were carried out, and L&Q was obliged to reimburse Henley’s partner, Timothy O’Hara, for the cost of a pair of shoes ruined when he had to wade with his young son through raw sewage, which regularly floods the parking area.

In spite of the problems, the service charge has been increased by 18% for next year, some of it for services that have not been provided.
Right to buy puts 40% of ex-council homes in private rental - MPs' report
Read more

“Each time we have a meeting with L&Q we are promised that things will get fixed and dealt with and then nothing happens or things get worse,” says Graeme Legge, a resident who has called for help from his MP, the mayor of London and the housing ombudsman.

“Sometimes the hot water outages last as long as a month but the compensation we have been offered has been paltry and we have had to push for rebates when we’ve been charged for services we haven’t received

L&Q says: “We would like to apologise to residents for the ongoing issues that they are experiencing. Repairs to the roof were completed earlier this year and we are installing a new boiler system to address the hot water outages, which we expect to be complete by the end of next week. We are enlisting an external supplier to mend the sewage pipe in the car park as it is a specialist repair job. It is being dealt with as an urgent matter.”

It adds that service charges are based on an initial estimate of expenditure, which is later reviewed. “In the case of this year, the charges for this estate have increased because a caretaking charge has been added,” it says. “All residents have received additional refunds where services were compromised. We have and will continue to compensate residents on a case-by-case basis in relation to any issues still affecting them.”

Last year, Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, announced an £8bn partnership with the company to build 20,000 homes, in spite of denouncing its poor maintenance record in a BBC interview in 2010. A further 80,000 new homes are planned within the next 10 years.

When asked about resident dissatisfaction with L&Q, the mayor’s office said Khan had raised the issues with L&Q but has no remit to get involved in individual complaints

The mayor believes that no one should have to live in substandard conditions, and landlords must resolve any issues with their homes as a matter of urgency,” it says. “Unlike affordable housing investment, the regulation of social housing landlords has not been devolved to the GLA in London. Nonetheless, when housing management issues are brought to the mayor’s attention by residents, his team picks them up with councils and housing associations directly, as they have done in this case.”

Housing associations are not-for-profit organisations created in the 1960s to provide low-cost homes for workers. However, critics claim that standards and affordability are being compromised as they become increasingly commercialised. Figures compiled by the Times show that nearly 100,000 homes built for social rent at less than 50% of the market rate have been sold off or converted for higher rents since 2012. The Chartered Institute of Housing predicts another 80,000 social rent homes will disappear by 2020.

Meanwhile, housing association chiefs’ pay has soared, with an average salary of £166,205 in 2017. Last year, L&Q’s chief executive, David Montague, received a basic salary of £344,000, making him the fifth-highest paid in the sector

This year, in spite of a slight cut, he will take home £408,564, including a bonus and cash in lieu of pension, yet residents complain he has ignored all requests to engage with them over their years of unresolved problems.

L&Q says that executive pay is set by a governance and remuneration committee and reflects “value for money, current market levels, and the importance of talent retention for an organisation that is large, complex and commercially driven to deliver social goals”.

Government cuts have helped drive the sector into ever more commercial ventures. In 2012 the budget that subsidised social housing was reduced by 60% and in 2015 George Osborne, the then chancellor, imposed a 1% annual rent cut for four years, only a year after committing to a decade of inflation-linked rises. This reduced the income of housing associations, many of which fund social projects using the profits from building, selling and renting full-price homes.
Mayor to subsidise 'naked' homes solution to London housing crisis
Read more

Last year 40% of L&Q’s £1bn turnover came from rents and sales at market rates. Although it is one of the most prolific builders in the sector, only half of the 100,000 homes it plans in the next decade will be what it describes as “genuinely affordable”

n the past financial year it made a record operating surplus of £420m and it says it increased spending on repairs and maintenance from £120m to £173m.

Many of its residents have yet to see the benefits. Henley, who has spent £810 on emergency accommodation, has been offered £720 in expenses by L&Q and nothing to compensate for the stress and inconvenience. She is planning to take her case to a small claims court.

“The leaks have been fixed but the security gates keep breaking down, we are regularly without hot water and, until now, L&Q has blamed the sewage leak in the car park on residents putting wet wipes down the loo,” she says. “It’s hard enough living and working in London with a new baby, without having to move frequently and endure the endless admin to get problems fixed.

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 13/08/2018 02:22

L and Qs chief executive says that the Dispatches doc wasnt balanced.

OP posts:
AnotherMum76 · 13/08/2018 12:11

No surprise there really!!!!

HelenaDove · 13/08/2018 15:13

Comment from underneath that article.

Katewashere
8h ago
2 3

I used to live in one of the developments in London run by L&Q. One week, out of the blue, the entire building received a formal letter saying our rent was to go up by 25%. I am a single person who works for the NHS who was already paying more than I could really afford. I am too old to still being living in the shared system and unable to afford to rent on the open market on my salary (I have a degree and am senior in my field but hey, austerity) so when I was given a flat through L&Q I was hugely relieved. I was at the point of planning to leave London before I got my flat. This rent hike pushed things back over the edge.

The letter was one of the most callous things I've ever read - it basically said that they knew this would be a shock which was why they were giving us a week to decide what to do - basically pay the increased rent, or move out. There was a number to call with any queries but when we rang the number there was a recorded voice message saying the man who had written the letter was on leave for the next ten days.

On my floor alone, three of my neighbours moved out and all of them were forced to leave London: one was a midwife who moved back with her parents on the Isle of Wight. Others were NHS key workers also.

I am relieved to see that the activities of L&Q are finally being investigated. If they are making deals to have access to land to build properties by pretending to Government that they provide affordable accommodation to key workers when the reality is that they do not, its time for Government to step in. It is not good enough for Sadiq to wash his hands, especially if he says that housing is a priority for him. L&Q need to be investigated

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 13/08/2018 15:21

MinxieSue wilfulsprite
16h ago
1 2

Yep!

Its called a Section 8 eviction...

All new Housing Association Tenancies created since 1991 can use this section, to evict you as soon as you have 8 weeks or more rent arrears. This option is not available to local authorities.

Housing Associations are increasingly using it as a way to evict tenants (even those who lose their jobs and have to claim Universal Credit, which is paid at least 6 weeks in arrears, and may take the DWP through admin delays much longer).

Don't look to the court to assist you either, even if the housing association hasn't bothered with repairs. The Tories tied the hands of the judges, and made it mandatory to grant an eviction warrant once the 8 weeks arrears had passed, no matter what caused the arrears...

Oh and you are unlikely to get legal aid to assist either!

Then, once the tenant is evited, the property is often re-let at full or not far off maximum market rent. So there is actually a perverse incentive for the housing association to evict tenants, sop the property can be re-let on a much higher rent!

Many former local authority tenants who voted to transfer to a Housing Association, have found themselves subsequently caught up in a section 8 notice eviction...

The only truly secure Housing Association lets (that have the same terms and conditions as local authority tenancies), are those created before 1st January 1989!

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 13/08/2018 15:40

WinWard2K14
8h ago
3 4

I too live in a relatively new L&Q development (Quebec Quarter) that is besieged by a string of ongoing problems that started on day one of moving in some 18 months ago.

Since then I have had to deal with no heating in the first few weeks of moving in, followed a spate of other issues and the latest saga is two huge leaks, the first of which severely damaged a number of flats including mine.

L&Q were appalling in terms of a response to all issues. I wrote to David Montague twice. He could not extend the courtesy to respond back despite profiting off the money he got through the sale of this property to me or the expensive service charge and part rent I pay each month, a portion of which goes to services I don’t get.

I have spoken to NHBC who were next to useless, the housing ombudsman who was next to useless, my solicitor who would not assist as he had a conflict of interest with L&Q. In the end I bombarded their Aftercare team and finally I am starting to get somewhere and stand up be noticed by L&Q.

If I could rewind the hands of time then L&Q would not get my business and I would not give them the time of day. They still cannot fully appreciate the impact their substandard housing and inept behaviour has had on me and my home life.

My view is so your homework before you contemplate becoming a client/customer of L&Q. They need a radical overhaul, the governance process needs a radical overhaul to ensure that residents are treated fairly and without prejudice and most importantly these big housing corporations are held to account for their poor customer relationships and substandard buildings

OP posts:
OP posts:
OP posts:
HelenaDove · 17/08/2018 16:09

Ms Nolan collapsed in her shared-ownership flat at Anne Carver Lodge in Stanley Avenue on August 1.

Police, alerted by social services, forced open her door after looking through her letter box and seeing her motionless on the floor.

But despite her desperate situation, landlord Notting Hill Genesis (NHG) Housing Association refused to fix her door, telling her concerned neighbours it was the pensioner’s responsibility

The leaseholders, most of whom have a shared ownership arrangement with the housing association, said it’s an example of how badly they are all treated – whether its confusion over service charge hikes, installing scaffolding to deal with a leak that was reported two years ago, or disregarding safety fire policy.

Lorraine Jimenez, who lives in one of the 30 flats within the three storey block, wrote to building insurers to determine who was responsible for Ms Nolan’s door. She said: “NHG point blank refused to arrange the repair or replacement of Claire’s door and told the police that she had to arrange the repair herself. This is despite them knowing her age and that she was in a bad way and taken by ambulance to hospital.”

And she claimed: “They stated that it was not their responsibility which in fact it is. The door is part of the fabric of the building and is as such covered by their buildings insurance so they had a duty arrange this repair. We’ve been having many issues with NHG but this is just callous.”

She explained how they have all seen the charges for cyclical work on the estate – such as structural changes, painting or replacing windows – “increased by 800 per cent”. And she said the residents association has been going “back and forth” arguing costs

The latest work is scaffolding that appeared on one side of the building on July 16, to repair a leak in a flat reported more than two years ago.

Hitesh Sangtani, whose home is affected by the scaffolding, said to date no one had appeared to do any work. He said: “I’m going to make a formal complaint about this. The last two weeks of July were very hot and the way they’ve mounted the metal beams, we could only open the window a fraction. My 70-year-old mother is suffering with the heat and also with the fear that a burglar might attempt to climb it and break into her room.

“At first we thought the scaffolding was part of cyclical work which is due to happen soon, but it’s independent of that. So why do this work now? When we will be charged again?”

Shelley Marcia added: “Service charges are always a problem. They are never accurate, always an estimate, so at the end of the year you get a letter saying you are in arrears, so you have to go back to them and the whole thing is very stressful – very, very stressful.

As for Ms Nolan’s door, her neighbours paid for the door to be replaced and hope to be reimbursed by NHG.

Her brother Joe Nolan flew from New York after being called by UK police officers and alerted to his sister’s condition.

The 80-year-old said: “She’s not well. The hospital wish to move her to a rehabilitation home but she’s very, very weak. From my understand NHG has the responsibility to respond, especially when it’s an emergency as happened to my sister. They were really unconcerned about what was transpiring. To think police were making the request. There should be no question when police contacts the housing association for assistance, there should be an immediate response.

“That was disgraceful. I hope this doesn’t happen to anyone else in future.”

He added: “The police were extremely courteous, civil and very concerned about my sister and very professional in their work. My wife and I really appreciated the kindness that has been offered by her neighbours who showed real concern. In this building the community should be fostered, not disregarded.”

A NHG spokesman said: “The upkeep of front doors is generally the responsibility of leaseholders, as set out in their lease, though our checks have shown that is not the case at Anne Carver Lodge. However, in these particular circumstances discretion should have been used regardless and the door repaired by us immediately. We thank the resident’s neighbours for their generous response and will of course reimburse them.” There was no comment on the other issues

OP posts:
HelenaDove · 07/09/2018 14:59

Path
@PathDevon

Had a client turned down for social #housing because he's just started a zero hours job, so can't prove what he will earn every month.

So their affordability check has denied him the cheapest housing he could get, so he remains #homeless.

OP posts:
OP posts:
OP posts:
OP posts:
OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page