We're still watching, but there aren't as many saucer-eyes of excitement as there used to be at the end of each episode.
I'm swayed by the argument that Moffat has had an arc in place since the start of series 5. I want to believe it, because I want us to have an explanation for all the loose ends and inconsistencies over the past couple of years. At the same time, I feel like everything has been directed towards the denouement of this series and possibly even the 50th anniversary at the expense of making sure every ep in the meantime is as good as it could be. I fundamentally don't understand why we couldn't have had some 2-parters to let some of the plots and characters "breathe" more, because too much is too rushed. Some of the concepts are really enjoyable, but there is no depth because there is not enough time for them to develop. And I get the feeling sometimes that the writer would have gone with a different resolution if they had not had to crowbar-in references to the series arc (e.g. power of songs, power of love, importance of family in this series). We don't get the chance to engage fully with the plot or characters and the payoff is too rushed/bodged to really satisfy.
Eg the fangirl in me loved seeing more of the TARDIS last week, but the speedy "Big Friendly Button" resolution, not so much.
So there is an argument that the series would be better with more, not less Doctor Who - more time so certain stories could be fully explored in the way in which the writer intended. The danger, of course, is that more time/episodes could further expose problems with Moffat's stewardship of the show, if that is what is going wrong.
Aitch I'm sorry that the Gaiman ep didn't grab you more, I was hoping we were on an upward swing towards the finale, quality-wise.
That said, unsatisfactory Doctor Who is still better than half the crud on TV....