I heard her on five live being interviewed about the programme yesterday afty. she did admit to being totally out of her depth with luke and his mum but if that was the case, why didn't she f*ck off out of it and let someone more qualified intervene? If that was our school, the head of year would be talking to mum and luke to try to get some communication going.
she said in this interview that kids are told that they should aim for 5 A-Cs in their GCSE but in her experience this was far too low a target - they should all be aiming for As and As. and maybe in this school, with the potential these kids had, they maybe should have been achieving more... but, like they say, education is wasted on the young and that's what many kids do: doss about, being slaves to their hormones and somehow manage to scrape enough GCSEs together to to the next stage. As long as they qualify for their A levels or whatever, the grades don't really matter to them. The majority of these kids will* pull it off when it comes to getting uni places, when grades actually do matter.
like i said before, it's the kids who don't go onto higher education who need the 5 GCSEs, the ones that go onto training schemes and into the workplace. and for some of those kids getting 5 A-Cs is a bloody miracle. it's an insult to kids like that to say their lives are over, or they got Cs because they didn't revise!!
she's basically a big-mouthed know-it-all who has been chosen as some sort of role model by the programme makers just because she's black and a woman in what is still a white male-dominated world (that of business). Good for her, but it doesn't make her a bloody expert in kids.