SATANIC ABUSE KIDS ON THIS MORNING NOW>>>>>

[tiredemma]

with fern and phil....

And it wasn't just Rochdale, by the way, it was Nottingham, Orkney, and other places too. Have they learned from this? Have they apologise? No, they went on to do it elsewhere and have since invented MSbP so they can carry on tormenting children and families.

I am sure there are good, dedicated social workers who want to protect children but there is something desperately wrong with the profession as a whole that these people can still be working, haven't been brought to account, and that the profession has gone on to embrace MSbP with such enthusiasm and gone on to do it all over again.

I spoke to the former president of the General Medical Council about this. He told me whenever MSbP is raised, doctors and social workers get into this hysterical witch-hunt mode, and absolutely refuse to look at the evidence or lack of evidence rationally. Even he wasn't believed when he tried to point out that the allegations against one of his patients were absurd - he was just told he was 'part of the problem' because he wouldn't fall into line. Anyone who dares to stand up to them is threatened until they daren't speak out.

It's a disgrace that they're still working in child protection.

And then they wonder why parents won't ask for help or support if they need it, because they're so scared a mad social worker will confiscate their children.

It hardly gives you confidence in the Social Work profession, does it?

I totally agree with Edam. Very powerful posts.

"there must have been something going on there.otherwise why couldnt they have their kids back for 10 years?" - stephanie that is a frightening post - what, there's no smoke without fire? is that it? someone who is accused of something must have done something to be accused in the first place??!

they wouldnt have taken their kids away for no reason would they?what i'm saying is that something must have happened for ss to get involved in the first place.if nothing had happened surely they would have got their kids back sooner wouldnt they?

Sadly Stephanie it doesn't always work that way with SS, especially in the past in this country.

IMO SS wanted to prove in the end they had reason to take the kids away, and they used the fact the parents were in debt and of lower IQ to do this.

my kids would've been taken away years ago if they could do it for having debts

Misdee, I would think most of the kids in the country would have been taken away by now. A huge percentage of people live permanently in debt, and I would have thought that parents would make up a larger percentage of that than non-parents.