Hi all,
is it me (overprotective) or is this just unacceptable.
My teenage child (A) has had a stern warning and negative points in school from an incident that took place in school.
Teenage A gets pushed and accidentally bumps into teenage B while on break.
Teenage B says fuck off you ginger c**t teenage A then replies shut up you smell fatty.
There were no teacher witnesses.
Later that day lunch, while near each other teenager A was playing with friends and shouts who's farted when teenager B says fuck of ginger and slaps them on the arm. Teenage A just walks away. Again no adult witness!
Now, teenager B goes to the head of year crying saying teenager A has been bullying them. Teenager A gets called out of class has a stern telling off and told they should have never reacted in the first incident and to stay away from teenager B.
Now does it make a difference that teenager A is a boy and teenager B a girl?
If it was the other way around would it have been dealt with differently - can you imagine if my son had slapped the girl?
Or am I just over thinking this?
Hope Iv not confused it, just wanted to start with no gender to see if it made a difference. Im actually fuming, yes he shouldn't have said anything but how had the other teenager not been dealt with the same or worse having hit another child?