skirt/hair length vs age

[puppydavies]

i'm curious; do people think there's an absolute cut off point beyond which having long hair or wearing short skirts becomes automatically muttonish?

is there a grey area depending on style (e.g. stilettos & leopard skin vs wooly tights and chunky boots) or perceived age (e.g. the "shock" factor of seeing someone's face after seeing them from behind).

if not hair/skirt length what have you decided that you are "too old" for style-wise? sadly or with relief?

Nothing wrong with short skirts if you have lovely legs at any age.

Nothing wrong with long hair if you have lovely hair at any age.

Most women's legs start to droop and their hair to grey by mid-forties/early fifties.

i am dreadfully grey and 39, it is dyed and shoulder length curls, short would look horrific. legs always, my mum is 70 and hers are still lovely too. mum has her hair undyed, long but up.