I have a crap tattoo on my lower back. Got it done about 20 odd years ago on impulse. It's a shit design I picked out of a book. It's also sort of stretched over the years so the "tribal bird" or whatever it's meant to be isn't symmetrical any more but it's obvious that it's meant to be. I also hate the slutty dated vibe of a tattoo that is meant to peek out from the top of your low slung jeans. It's fairly small though, maybe 3 inches across and slightly less down. All black. I DO like tattoos. I have others and this is the only one that I regret. Having said that I probably wouldn't bother getting one now otherwise. So should I:
a) ignore it. It's on my back anyway so I can't actually see it, but I'm quite self conscious about it on the beach or whatever and tend to try and pull my swimsuit or bikini bottoms over it (DH says he quite likes it!?!)
b) get it lasered. I'm a bit scared of this option. Bit worried about the pain / number of times I'll need to go back & cost as well as the potential harms of absorbing the ink into my bloodstream once it's been broken down
c) get a cover up. I'm thinking a floral design with family birth flowers - not very exciting admittedly but also don't think I'd regret it. I've found a fabulous artist who thinks it would be a fairly easy cover because the dark lines I have would be incorporated into dark leaves with fine line flowers above. I'm sorting of leaning towards this option but then like I said I'm really only considering it for the sake of a cover rather than because I REALLY WANT a new tattoo.
It would sort of go slightly up and across one side of my back so Def wouldn't give the vibe of meant to show off my arse from above my jeans (which is what I hate the most!!)
WWYD??