This kind of trouser

[PiglingQuartet]

What is it with this current type of trouser fit that people like? It is the first time in living memory that I've seen stuff looking worse on a model than it should.. There is a lot of this about online, often very expensive, but I don't see it much in real life.

I love the idea of baggier trousers and the quality impresses me, but something seems off. I don't think we all ought to dress to flatter either, but if you like these can you tell me why? I love a less fitted silhouette but there's just so much fabric.
I would be utterly lost in them if they are this sacklike on a tall model. My crotch could hide a thousand ferrets down there.

Is it intentional, the bad fit? I am sure these highly respected brands could easily design a more impressive bum/hip area so what gives?

I also don't think this is a 'masculine' style as men never look this terrible in loose, cord trousers, there is always good detail and fit/design at the waist and crotch.

It forces you to either wear a very wide top to hide the waist or tuck in to reveal it. Anything else would sit lumpily at the hip area over this much fabric.

Wow those are hideous! I like the baggy jeans look with a cropped too on a slim tones physique (sadly I don't have one) but these look like worzel gummidge just took them off!

And they're in the hundreds!
There is a really odd take on silhouette currently, and I SHOULD like it - but it seems to deliberately destroy any body type.
A high waist can look beautiful, but this style has more of a brick-like shape, and looks really badly designed, whether worn with a loose top or a tucked in tighter one.
If the idea is to cover the pelvis with a shirt or jumper, then why not at the very least make the crotch area less lumpy and blockish?