I'm in the market for some short(ish) boots, to be used mostly for muddy walks. I don't mean technical hikes in the Cotswold, just taking the kids to local parks, on paths with plenty of mud.
I am basically undecided between:
-
boots like the Muck Boots, with a combination of rubber at the bottom, neoprene on the leg, and an airmesh lining inside www.outdoorgearlab.com/reviews/shoes-and-boots/rain-boots/the-original-muck-boot-company-wetland, and
-
leather boots like the Chameau or the Dubarry www.vintageguns.co.uk/magazine/dubarry-kildare-boots - but ideally something cheaper :)
Thoughts / impressions / experiences?
It seems to me that:
- the Muck boots are cheaper, much easier to clean and get mud off
- leather boots are more expensive but they obviously look much nicer and I suspect will be more breathable
- If I were to use them ONLY for muddy walks, I'd get the cheaper, easier-to-clean Muck Boots. However, the hope is that with something like the Dubarry I can, say, meet a friend for lunch and go elsewhere without looking like a fisherman, then pick up the kid from school and take him to the park even if it's muddy
I am ruling out ordinary rubber wellies because I sweat too much in them and they always gave me blisters, no matter the socks.
Military / tabbing / mountaineering boots with laces are probably better for long hikes on difficult terrain, but that's not what I do, plus they'd probably be harder to clean from the mud than boots with no laces. And I don't want to look like some kind of special force soldier!
Thanks!