I think it is fashionable to hate heels on MN. Even if many of us never really liked them in the first place (that's be me!). This is why people often call things they don't feel comfortable in 'dated' - it lets them off the hook, it pleases the ego being able to look down on it as off trend because you were never comfy in them when they were trending.
And even more so if we can make it into a feminist issue. Therefore ALL woman who like high hells must be doing it for men.
As a feminist I believe that a woman has the choice whether or not she likes to dress to please men. I may not do it, you may not do it, but it is not feminist to demand everyone conforms to one idea of high heels.
But what would people do, really, and i mean really really, if they came back in fashion? I bet many of you would suddenly find merit in them and go on and on about how dated flats/trainers were.
That's how it seems to work.
I loathed wide legs and flares for decades but have to admit that now they are easier on my eye and i recently bought a pair of slouchy jeans. I would never have done that a few yrs ago, and I consider myself outside of the snares of trends.
Many of us never wore heels anyway, so it is easier for us not to care, but I bet any money if fashions dictated a necessity for higher heels (by creating longer leg lengths etc), people would suddenly find them covetable. I have seen this happen with bootcuts, flares, long and short dresses, crop or longline over the years. High hells will be no different.
Notice the trend for platform converse, superga, and blocky shoes in shops like urban outfitters, Asos, and many other stores. It is heels in a new guise, that is all. Hells in the style of casual instead of office.
Obviously a heel is not dated at all, unless you are over 40.
I'm playing devil's advocate here, and include myself in this suggestion, so no offence intended. Just worth thinking about!