Most hairdressers I know won't do a dry cut, only cut and blow. Reasons I've been given in the past include: 'I can cut it better when it's wet' and 'we want you leaving the salon looking good'. Both of which I can understand, but occasionally when a hairdresser can't fit in a cut and blow, they might be able to fit in a dry cut, or if I don't have time for the full works - but they won't, without charging the full price for a C&B anyway.
So far, so understandable. But my current salon, where I have 2 different stylists, depending on availability, dry my hair first and then cut it - which rules out the cutting when wet reason. They then style it with straighteners, which takes minutes and could be done on my hair after a dry cut. Am I missing something?
To be clear, mostly I don't mind but just occasionally when I don't have much time myself, or they could squeeze in a dry cut but not a C&B, a dey cut would be useful. I don't get it - other than obviously more revenue - which I also understand.
(Not a TAAT, but promoted by advice n a money saving thread to go for a dry cut to save money - no salon I have ever used near me offers this.)