You know, a version of all those dresses would already be in the wardrobe of the sort of woman who is going to pay those prices or above. for starters, the Camellia dress looks like the sort of print the lower end of the high street (disseminating from designers) started putting out a couple of years ago.
The kimono shape is, theoretically, fairly "classic" ^and 70s. But ... it's everywhere.
Yes, there;s an argument for a niche for those ideas coming out in better fabrics than Top Shop/Oasis but more affordably than designer, but the point is the shops that do that have already done it.
I think they're aiming at a tricky market. Kew was a place you could go to for a staple (cardigan, belt, etc.) at a reasonable price. This looks as if they are trying for a slightly less-fashionable Jigsaw. Does a woman really want to buy clothes at a self-consciously "less-fashionable fashion" ie. "Ms Two or Three Seasons Behind Tried and Tested By Everyone And Deemed Safe" shop?? I'm wondering how representative of the re-positioning this selection is.