Yeah, funnily enough I have the same situation here - strange how often the clothes situation crops up isn't it?
When I pick up my daughter she regularly is wearing clothes that are too small for her and old. I mean what is wrong with these people? My ex isn't short of money (well apart from probably pissing 8k up the wall recently on an abortive attempt at a sole residence order and using solicitors etc, quite rightly a shared residence order was made), she gets ALL the child benefit, child tax credits, tax credits etc. I get bugger all. Plus I pay CSA - although I don't have a problem with that in principle (although I did pay madam's fulltime nursery fees for 3 years, and the ex , ha!, tried to bully me into paying £500 per month for child maintenance).
I did a CSA online calculation taking into account the fact that madam lives at my house 30/35% year and me and partner have a new baby, it works out at £151 month CSA monies. I don't mind, as any extra money is extra I can provide for madam at my house.
You see, there is a financial incentive to reduce contact, as the CSA calculation only uses overnight staying contact to calculate child maintenance. Less overnights for the other parent, more money for the "resident" parent.
... and there comes another gripe.
Even though the courts have made a ruling that in my case there is a Shared Residence Order in place - which means that BOTH parents have residence, that madam has TWO homes OF EQUAL VALUE, that just by deem of being in possession of the child benefit book, my ex is deemed the "Residence Parent" and suddenly I am the "Non-Resident Parent". So I am liable for child maintenance.
Even if there was a 50:50 shared care arrangement in place, the fact that the ex has the child benefit in her name means that the CSA consider HER to be the resident parent and me the ABSENT parent. How outrageous.
So Anna888 - even if you get a 50:50 shared care arrangement, the ex will still be the resident parent and you guys will still be liable to pay child maintenance, even though child is at yours 1/2 the time!!!! This is the reason Michael Cox (barrister) went to court and to jail on principle - he has a 50:50 shared care arrangement but was being persecuted by the CSA despite his ex not wanting them too!
It's a rotten system to it's core
Anyway, back to the subject - I tend to just send madam back in whatever clothes she was wearing, washed. Too many times have I seen coats, clothes, shoes, bags just end up at the ex's. I am not here to fund her clothes buying, that is HER responsibility. I provide for my daughter when she is at mine, the ex can do the same when madam is on her watch.
Anyway, I always keep a stock of cheap clothes from tesco's in case of emergencies should I need to drop madam off at ex's in some other clothes.
sad isn't the way some people sink to these depths???? They think the world owes them a living.