@ciel
I was agreeing with what another pp said about travelling and not pandering to the needs of stepkids at a young age (as a SM) or not having stepkids at weekends.
Ever consider that you may be settling by choosing a man just because they don't have kids.
Not at all. didn't just settle for any man without kids. I had other criteria as well.
I don't need to be dealing with the hassle all the SMs are complaining about here.... and I'm not saying the complaints are unfounded. If I was left with someone else's toddler after I'd had a C section, there's no doubt I would also be pissed off about it...which is why I wouldn't ever have married a man who already had kids.
The problem lies with the man ..thinking his new DP/DW is free childcare and not stepping up to the plate.
I didn't just settle for any single man, I had other criteria as well.
Also re your comment about older women in their late 30s having to be realistic and settle for men with kids.
The reason I say this, is for the men who want children, they would really be looking for a woman younger than late 30s, due to the decline in fertility.
So if a woman is late 30s to 40s...chances are a man in your same age group will already have kids or not want kids.
Your DH being late 30s when his kids are grown is great...but if he has more kids with you..the kids are a generation away in age and as such very unlikely to have a sibling relationship.
He doesn't deserve to be punished for this forever.
I don't see it as punishing anyone. Just a case of not needing the drama and hassle of stepkids and an Ex.
I'd say its better for a woman with kids, to date a man with kids....because they'll have a better understanding of the responsibilities of having DC and they bring an equal amount of baggage into the relationship.
...and of course you can have fun at any age... but you certainly don't need to be looking after and worrying about kids that aren't yours and missing out on weekends together, as has been mentioned by SMs in this thread.