We have had shared care, week with/week without and have had for a few years now once DP's ex finally settled on which days he wanted.
Oldest dsd is living with us full time at the moment as she studies for her exams (and that's actually working out really well), dsd2 and dss are still on the weekly change about.
Recent request
Ex - would you consider changing the arangements so I can take a contract to work away from home 3 days a week
DP - No. (Expecting that to be the end of, as per Mumsnet Step parenting Rule No 1)
Several days later
Ex - can you think about this more quickly as I have to give an answer tomorrow.
DP - I said no, nothing more to say.
Several days later
Ex - can you have the kids every Monday night as well so Grandma only has to stay over two nights a week
DP - When you asked me if I would consider changing the arrangements I said No.
Ex - Could you help out with running the kids to school/sports/friends while I'm away?
DP - Why aren't you putting your parental responsibilities ahead of anything else?
Ex - I am, but when I'm not able to fulfil those responsibilities the ex wife takes them on. That's the way it works.
That's not an unusual type of statement in itself coming from the ex, but as DP had already stated she wouldn't change the arrangements would you have expected ex to go ahead and take the job anyway?
And the reason for not changing them is because, and this has been repeated to ex many times, the week we have the kids DP sacrifices work time and her professsional obligations, and the week she doesn't have them she makes up for that.
Now the guilt trip. Grandma is no spring chicken and not in the peak of fitness, every conversation like this always gets 'supporting the kids' and 'parenting together' thrown in for good measure.
I can't actually imagine what sort of changeover arrangements we could have on this basis which weren't really erratic and disruptive and how on earth DP would get enough time at work.
How would you have responded to this?