Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Step-parenting

Connect with other Mumsnetters here for step-parenting advice and support.

Is living next-door to each other the ideal for couples with kids from previous relationships, instead of trying to blend families?

33 replies

Raptor · 11/08/2012 23:38

Because DP and I are beginning to think so.

He lives with my DS (8) and me, and has his three young children with him (and therefore us) almost 50% of the time. Life is full-on. The house is always a mess. Our loyalties to our kids can be divisive. We get little time together to talk, touch base, connect, for days on end, with the relationship depending a lot on a fortnightly child-free weekend when we're able to get back on the same page.

My DS struggled ? understandably ? with our household expanding at first, but has been given a lot of understanding and time to adjust and is now coping admirably; he is fond of DP and likes company ? but even so, he still often wrestles with the set-up, and so I worry I'm putting him through too much.

DP has begun the process of trying to arrange for his eldest to live with him most of the time (I posted about this in another thread), which I support in principle, because I can see that it's in the best interests of his son. But of course, this means more upheaval for us ? and even less respite from an already exhausting living arrangement.

I feel torn between cooperating with what I think is right for DP's child, and not giving so much of myself (and forcing DS to do the same) that I effectively become depleted - emotionally, energy-wise, time-wise, sanity-wise. I'm worried about relinquishing a (reasonable ? not obsessive) sense of control over mine and DS's lives and home. I worry we're going to have little personal space/peace/calm/order/quiet/quality one-to-one time/all sorts of other stuff. I feel anxious, irritable, unsettled, and as though mine and DP's relationship is slipping away from us, because there's so little room in our increasingly children-packed lives to nurture it. And I feel resentful about the prospect of these changes, and then guilty about feeling resentful. I'm just not myself.

DP and I fantasise that perhaps the ideal solution for couples like us, with children from previous relationships who are with each of us a lot/most of the time, is to live next-door to each other. This way, no one feels 'invaded', there's no confusion over rules, there's sufficient personal space, DS isn't forced to share the only home he remembers (and his mum) with up to three other children, day in day out ? lots of potential theoretical pluses.

We could actually adapt my house (not easily ? it would be a big project) to create an annex that DP and his kids could then live in (I could pay for the work and if the relationship failed, could rent the annex out to someone else), and we're feeling more and more like we'd like to give it a go. Are we nuts? Probably. But we are both feeling the strain of the living arrangement - trying to blend one family from two can be so hard - and something has to give, and this feels like the only solution. But I also wonder if we're romanticising the idea and, in reality, we could end up like neighbours that hardly see each other.

Oh I don't know. It's good to just vent really, as I'm feeling pretty wound up about it all, but I'd be interested to know what others think.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
charlearose · 30/08/2012 19:59

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

achillea · 30/08/2012 20:07

I think children should never have to be shunted from one place to the next. They should stay in the family home that they grew up in and parents should then move out, entering the home on their visitation days only. Why should kids be uprooted because their parents don't get on?

OK, completely mad idea. Never been there so don't know and shouldn't comment.

NotaDisneyMum · 30/08/2012 22:11

Mad? Undoubtedly.

Unhelpful? Certainly.

Disrespectful? When posted on the step-parenting board, most definitely!

Angry
achillea · 31/08/2012 00:22

Not disrespectful, just an honest opinion. A mad but honest one.

If at all possible allow children to stay in their own home. Parents can cope with part time homes much better than children.

Bonsoir · 31/08/2012 07:50

What a silly idea, achillea. The very one thing that all professionals agree upon is that children must never be made boss of the family and have the adults revolve around them.

NotaDisneyMum · 31/08/2012 09:17

achillia Are you from the US? The term visitation is not used here in the UK and many separated parents here share the care of their DCs, so the children have two homes, and two families that they are a member of.

The idea that it is better to exclude DCs from a significant portion of their parents lives is one which most step-parents would find incomprehensible.

Petal02 · 31/08/2012 10:14

?children should never be shunted from one place to the next. They should stay in the family home that they grew up in, and the parents should then move out, entering the home on their visitation days only.?

This has surely got be a wind up. Even if (ha ha ha ha ha) DH and I wanted to have such an arrangement with his ex and her new husband, the practicalities are mind-blowing.

Obviously the family home would need to be run (financially), then DH and I would need a house of our own, and so would the ex and her husband. So three properties would need to be paid for. Who would pay/receive maintenance? Who would receive child benefit?

Are you also suggesting that when each parent returns to the family home for their share of the week, that they should do so without their new partner and any ?new? children with that partner? Or if the new partner was to accompany the parent to the family home for access, what about the ?new? children, or any children the partner had from her previous marriage/relationship?

It?s a recipe for disaster, financially impossible for 99% of the population, a complete minefield and can have only been suggested by someone who?s never been in a step family.

And as has already been suggested, it means the children rule the entire set-up, and we all know what problems that causes.

Raptor · 31/08/2012 12:57

What everyone else said, re achillea's post.

Another thing: if the children never get uprooted from their home, and each of their parents had different approaches to parenting and expectations of/consequences for certain behaviour, what would happen to the concept of 'house rules'? Same house, but constantly shifting rules, depending upon which parent is boss.

As other posters have said, while it would keep the DC in their original home, any subsequent partners (which can help to make a separated parent happier personally, and therefore a happier parent, which is good for kids) and children would have their lives turned upside down and be shunted about. So this arrangement wouldn't eradicate uprooting children after separation/divorce; it would just transfer the shunting about to other people (including children) in the equation.

I think the ideal is if Mum and Dad can talk easily together about their DC, while running separate happy homes with clear rules. I think most children can handle, and gain a lot from, this.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page