Hello all,
I've been lurking on various topics in MN including the step parenting one but have been lured out by our current situation.
My partner has one daughter by his previous marriage aged 10 and we have been gradually finding our way through the court process to get him some decent access for her. We are currently still waiting for the next hearing. She changes the access arrangements every few weeks to suit her shift pattern on a fairly bizarre basis at the best of times but this was the only way he could get any weekday time from mediation 6 months ago. He currently has some weekend overnight access (which is often randomly cancelled) and one evening a week, usually for tea. The current shift pattern is particularly unfortunate and she is stating he can only see DSD on Tuesdays... between 9pm and 11pm 
She is basically a good mother but can't seem to see that this is going to disturb her school day the next day and she should be in bed at that time. She says that she always reads until 11 anyway and she can't see why its a problem and she can come over in her PJs so she can just jump into bed when he drops her off.
He can't afford a solicitor so is self-representing which has not been so bad so far but we're stuck on the following question:
Should he
a) not see DSD on the allocated time on Tuesday which will upset and confuse her (ex will tell her he doesn't want to see her) and mean he loses out on any weekday time. It would also mean the status quo drops to weekend contact only after many battles to get some weekday time.
b) stick to the 'agreement' and see her these days to show willing. This doesn't seem fair on DSD either and he's worried the court will perceive him as as bad as the ex by doing something that he clearly feels is not in her interest.
Are we
c) being slightly over anxious about the 11pm bedtime in the circumstances and she'll probably manage fine for a few weeks.
or
d) pandering to more lunacy.
votes (and any thoughts) please!