I?m never quite convinced why anyone would need to meet an ex?s new partner. As previous posters have pointed out, you have to assume that the father is responsible enough to ensure that only suitable people come into contact with the child when he/she is with him. It?s not for the ex to ?vet? those people, otherwise surely the ex would be vetting school teachers, neighbours, friends parents etc ? the list would be endless.
If you go down the route of letting the ex ?vet? the new partner, then it suggests that the ex has decision-making powers over whether the new partner should be allowed to spend time with the child, and then you?re on really dodgy ground.
I?ve also heard of women who try to stop father?s seeing their children either because the woman hasn?t met the new partner, or maybe she just doesn?t like her. I?m sure there was a thread on here recently, where the child wasn?t allowed to ?overnight? with the father if his new girlfriend was in the house. Very manipulative.
One poster comments that ?you wouldn?t leave a child with a childminder you?ve never met? ? but every parent leaves their child with school teachers they?ve never met.
And then you have the total opposite, which is what happens in our household: the ex isn?t interested in meeting me, I doubt she?d care if I were Myra Hindley, just so long as her son is ?off her hands? on a regular basis.
I?m sure you get women who just want to ?check-out? their husband?s new girlfriend, and that?s not really fair either.
Redhen raises an interesting point about needing to know if the child is taking any medication ? good point, because we didn?t know til last year that SS is supposed to have a syringe with him at all times. The ex won?t co-parent with DH, and certainly doesn?t communicate with me, so this information was never passed on. And of course it would have been SS that ultimately suffered if he?d been taken ill at our house, we wouldn?t have know what was going on.