We only had SS (age 16) for Christmas Day. And of course the rest of the family was round too, so it 'dilutes' him. However there was one BIG blow-up ..... we were about to start dishing up Christmas dinner, when SS decides he wants to connect his X-box to the TV in the kitchen. Our kitchen is square-shaped, and he fetched in a dining room chair, plonked it in the middle of the kitchen, and proceeded to start playing on his X-box. I walked into the kitchen at this point, realised there was no way we could finish cooking or dish up with someone sitting literally in the middle of the room. I said "come on SS, we can't do anything with you sitting there, can you do it upstairs." Husband then hissed "he's not doing any harm" well no, but he'd completely paralysed the kitchen. My Dad then walked in, and said (in a light hearted way) "SS, we won't be getting any dinner unless you move" - again, husband snapped, saying SS wasn't doing any harm. Dad's face was a picture, and he left the room.
Afterwards, Dad confided that this one incident summed up everything I'd ever complained about, and he could now see EXACTLY where I was coming from. I was furious with husband. Firstly, I never expected he'd over-rule me, particularly not in front of SS. However, he still seems to think that we should have postponed xmas lunch to indulge SS's x-box activities.
This left an atmosphere for the rest of the day.
On boxing day, husband commented how hard he finds my brother, and that he was pleased he only has to see him once a year. I hit the roof about this. My brother is indeed hard work, however husband should thank his lucky stars that he's not here every other weekend ... I pointed out that if I invited my brother to hang round our house on alternate weekends, husband would have left me a long time ago, and that it's no different to my discomfort with SS.
However, that was the only issue over the festive season. We've just been away for a few days, over what should have been an access weekend. With this in mind, I fully expected SS would be with us for the coming weekend (Fri/Sat 7/8 Jan) but no - husband insists the rota is adhered to, and in order not to break the cycle, SS won't be here until the weekend 14/15 Jan. This, of course, is music to my ears, however I find it all very strange. By sticking to the rota, it's meant that husband won't see his son properly for nearly a fortnight. It seems that it's OK not to have much contact, just so long as the rota is adhered to. Obviously I'm not complaining about having some child-free time, but it does seem that the rota conquers all, and as much as I find it frustrating, SS and husband lose out too. Common sense can rarely prevail, life is run via the rota .....
Funny old world!