DD, aged 6 has CP. Can walk with Kaye-walker and a bit with tripods but is shaky and can only manage short distances really. So at home she crawls and anything tricky or long distance she goes in a wheelchair.
Now, we are busting a gut here with the walking and standing and all the professionals are pushing that along too and I felt like our big aim here is to get her walking as well and as much as possible and see how far we can make progress.
BUT it suddenly seems to be dawning on me that whereas I am hoping for a continued upward curve, actually we are headed for a plateau when eventually we will ditch the sticks and frame and just give in to the wheelchair. Hard to explain, but the odd comment here or there about the vague future always seems to be about the wheelchair, and taking things as far as we can and then compromising. The professionals won't really be drawn either way except that clearly she will always need a wheelchair, but then they are a bit vague.
It feels like I am emerging from a cloud and suddenly I get it, but it feels like a cruel joke. Why are we pushing her with the frame and the sticks if in a few years we will abandon them anyway? I don't think any of us really believe that she is going to manage completely independent walking ever, so what is the point of all this?
Come to think of it, you never see adults with walking frames do you?
Has anyone else been through this or going through this now - have your docs been more honest? Do you have a child who got to a point and then ditched the frame and tripods? I hate the uncertainty so much and feel like we put her through so much and maybe it is for nothing. Also, why give her the sort of freedom she has in her walker if it is then going to be taken away from her - maybe we should instead be concentrating on teaching her to maneouvre her own wheelchair?