I'm so cheesed off.
School have at last organised a meeting. I have got the OT to come. The community paediatrician says she will send someone. I'm going to see if Parent Partnership will attend too.
The IEP we have got is complete poo. For weaknesses, it says 'mumbles, lacks self esteem'. No mention of SCD or why there is an IEP. Targets include do morning routine independently - no strategy. And have adult conversation 10-15 minutes (measure of success (less handlicking/better eye contact). Community paed got that removed.
The IEP was handed to me at a meeting in November. I had chased to put this meeting in place. SALT had been and DS's teacher had said 'he's miles off SA+' (which he is on now) and I needed to get SENCO involved as the teachers were useless.
I had to ask at the meeting if DS was on the SEN register. I was told yes and handed the IEP. I asked when it had been drawn up and was told 'for the meeting'. Apart from targets etc, it was blank. The copy I have is dated October but now has entries going back to September.
Now backdating the IEP is not the end of the world - a lie yes - but so what? It erodes my trust but I can leave it at that.
However, I have set up this meeting because SENCO has not provided any social skills intervention for DS this team. As far as I can see, he is getting no additional assistance in any way.
I am tired of dragging out bits of informtion from them so I challenged them about keeping parents up to date in relation to SEN and progress.
I get the Deputy (who is SENCO) telling me that handing out new IEPs at parents evenings is standard practice so they are sorry it is not good enough for me. It was not at an parents evening but at a meeting I had to arrange and I had to drag them kicking and screaming to!
Senco also tells me that he is 'secure' in his knowledge of ASD as he worked in a school for autistic children. So why has he cut my son's social skills provision and not provided any assistance?
Is he saying he has no SCD?
I'm so mad but trying to be constructive saying we need to set fresh, appropriate goals and use the attendance of experts to do this. I don't want the meeting next week to be wasted in a tit-for-tat 'you said x but did y' etc. This will be pointless.