My son's school have put in for him to have a statutory assessment(4 yrs, ASD, minimally verbal, aloof).He's in mainstream and they don't seem to be doing anything with him - I'd like to try and steer him towards a special school if at all possible (have an appt to go and look around a very good local school with ASD provision). I don't want to do miles of waffle answering all the points that they suggest you should if you want to put a report into panel because there are a number of reports going in that already make all of that explicit. The paed has done a report which is useful in context, it certainly doesn't minimise his problems! Has him functioning at well below half his actual age. I also have a report from his EYAS (from July this year) which I don't think will go to the panel and I think I should put it in myself in concert with my contribution but I want to know if I'm barking up the wrong tree in what I'm trying to do. This report from the EYAS reflects a far more able child than the paed's report does, I want to use it to argue that it shows the benefit of an appropriate specialised approach to my son (because that is exactly what it does show) but I'm worried that they might just use it to argue that he's capable of functioning with minimal support in a mainstream class - DISASTER! What does anyone here think?
thanks (just for reading all this)