I justb emailed the LEA- if it might cost themm money they might help LOL
We have encountered a problem with Sam at X Juniors and we're not sure how best to deal with it, we wondered if anyone in your team had any ideas.
Sam has school dinners, this is very important as he has possible eating disorders related to his AS, and also there is a tendency for his year younger brother to act as carer if they are together, so one goes to dinners, the other to sandwiches. I have tried so many times to get lunchtime support but school don't want it so I gave up and adopted this approach instead.
We have recently had a number of letters saying that Sam isn't;t paying. We have been sending lunch money each day and we don't know where it goes; Sam says it is stolen but Sam has a poor understanding of such events.
I spoke to school today and they say we have to pay otherwise it will go to Newport. My point is that I don't see why I should pay twice, but they said its not paying twice and his SEN is irrelevant, I disagree wholeheartedly, I think that he has clearly not received enough support to enable him to access dinners effectively (or is being bullied as an alternative). Their failure to do this shouldn't, in my opinion, result in us being billed.
We now have a system that Sam will drop money off each morning which is excellent, but it came with the bizarre caveat 'as long as you realise we're not doing this because of his SEN, we do this for many children. Of course it is! Sam's failure to be able to organise himself is being addressed with charts and systems at school, and is a widely recognised part of AS, so why this comment?
Is there a chance that the next statement could be adapted to include this situation with loss of money and other things- currently the problem is costing me hundreds of pounds a term in equipment.clothing etc and as a Carer I cannot afford it; but without something in writing it seems the school will not view it as AS related, and it is a difficulty that will have enormous impact at comprehensive level (he is year 5, so not that far off).
It seems there are charts etc to help Sam, but I now too well that unless Sam is forced to read the charts and follow them through, they will have little impact.
We are also a bit concerned that the focus is so heavily on the money he has lost (under £10) and nobody will mention where it has gone- I feel that something is amiss at school as his behaviour at home has deteriorated to a very severe level (something that happens when he is struggling to cope with school but managing to hold it together). This is impacting markedly on his younger sibling Stirling, and is causing us severe difficulties as a family unit.
I would be interested to know your thought on this. It seems to me that school is in loco parentis whilst he is there, and that whilst I am willing t pay the actual money, whatever is causing the issue is being swept under the carpet and as such, a very significant life skill is not being addressed.
The only person I have had contact with over this is the Secretary who is lovely and seemed unhappy, but who is not really equipped in my opinion to be able to determine what is related to SEN and what is simply small children.
---------
Long winded I know but I wasn'tr sure where to cut it back.
We're really struggling with ds1 atm, and its all becuase school isn't prividing for his needs; 10 hours a week won't cut it and I am sick of sending DS2 isn with a cut face or neck or whatever it was this week.