I met my paed. today (and educated her about the timetimer, calendar, family tree, clock, etc - I feel like your Apostle sometimes Moondog except when I am expressing my love of Stanley Greenspan).
She's happy for me not to seek diagnosis (she no longer has any credible answer to the question "what for?" given that no-one thinks he needs 1-1 support) and also happy for me to see her annually as his needs may change. All good stuff. Meanwhile, I've told the SALT that her job is to assert, repeat, and repeat again to the nursery staff that DS2 is a visual learner with a fear of whirring noises. Then she should go back a month later and train them all over again...then again a month later, and so on until he's 18.
The SALT warned me that when a child is progressing well like DS2, problems sometimes kick off in Year 1 "when the curriculum becomes more language-heavy and abstract"
It made me wonder (as I often have done) - how come (i)he's so good with numbers and they are abstract (ii)ditto letters (iii)"spectrummy" people who do very well in life tend to gravitate to jobs where they work with entirely abstract information (computer code or musical notes, for example).
Does anyone know what the profs really mean by "abstract" other than "wh?" questions? Why are numbers somehow not abstract when our kids are drawn to them? Is "concrete" only things you can see?