DS3 is 6, Yr1, Statemented with 20 hours a week of 1 to 1. He has Verbal Dyspraxia - and made great progress while there was a lot of SALT input (pre-school and Reception), but (in this LEA, at least), the SALTs have a more hands-off approach once they start Yr1. In theory the SALT comes in once a half-term, sees DS3 and gives his LSA a new set of exercises and games to do with him.
What has actually happened is that the SALTs have seen him once a term (a whole different story and a problem I'm working on) and DS3's speech is slipping again. Sounds that he had sort of grasped - like the difference between S and SH - have become muddled up again. There's no way I can say this without sounding like some sort of intellectual snob (and I'm really not), but part of the reason, aside from the chaos that is Children's Services, is the fact the LSA is very very stupid. She's a kind, lovely woman who is genuinely fond of DS3 and DS3 really likes her. She's been very very kind to me. I like her a lot. But I had to explain what a verb is, she wasn't sure how to spell "consonant" and wasn't completely sure what a syllable is. She doesn't understand how to deliver the SALT exercises, and in the absence of SALTs being around, she really needs to have some initiative. She's just out of her depth.
DS3's Statement Review is coming up and I think it will be agreed as it stands for another year, and the LSA will then move to Yr2 with him. I don't want her to lose her job, I don't want to say "X isn't up to the job", but equally I don't want her as DS3's LSA for another year. Can anyone think of a way out of this? In an ideal world the problem would be resolved if the SALTs were more involved, but realistically that's not going to happen anytime soon. I sense that the teacher and the SENCO feel as I do but I'm scared to open the whole can of worms by discussing it with them.