Hi. We had the right to choose two part autism assessment for my 6 year old son. At the end of the online developmental history assesment which was part two, the clinician said he concluded autism. We asked what led him to that conclusion and he read out a few things from the ADOS report. My partner and I, without discussing it, both immediately said we don't recognise those descriptions of our son.
Examples include batting and snapping fingers, no imaginative play, bending wrists back on furniture, rubbing the carpet.
Now, we feel our son is likely autistic and he does stim but of course we can't precede with diagnosis when their descriptions sounds like another child.
He was also already familiar with the frog book they use to assess imaginative storytelling.
It also felt like they didn't take into account the fact he has ARFID and how that impacts behaviour.
The clinician shut down any kind of conversation about this and said he wasn't at the ADOS so can't comment. He advised us to get the notes. Now Psicon are pushing back and saying they've never encountered this before and won't let us have the notes. It feels like they're trying to push us towards to conclusion meeting and report write up regardless of our concerns We've had to submit a subject access request for the notes.
Has anyone experienced anything like this before?
We're deeply concerned they are churning out a medical document that will be with him forever but doesn't reflect him at all or provide any support we may need in the future.