Please or to access all these features

SN children

Here are some suggested organisations that offer expert advice on special needs.

EHCP review time.....

5 replies

Exasperado · 25/02/2026 10:38

Hi, it's EHCP review time again and I've just read the paperwork. Anyone else ever felt completely demoralised and like they are just a crap parent after reading this stuff?

I know the whole point is to identify the needs. But they don't in a way that makes it sound like it's his parenting that's the issue and not his disabilities. They keep making a point about "needs supporting and encouraging more to develop independence skills at home. Still requires parent to brush teeth."

Thing is they are just going off what he says, not talking to us, and have absolutely no context because this boy is really difficult to get a full, factual sentence out of bless him! And he doesn't understand his needs himself!

For context, he is almost 15. Was born at 28 weeks, had brain bleeds, pda almost requiring surgery and so was on breathing support for 6 months, and has had issues with muscle tone since birth which meant prolonged tube feeding and not being able to take solids until he was a year old. He is also diagnosed with ADHD, ASD, epilepsy, global delays, learning disabilities,dyspraxic tendencies and hEDS.

All of this has impacted on his toothbrushing. He got his first tooth at 13 months, and we've worked so hard on brushing ever since. He was terrified of it after all those months of invasive oxygen and feeding support. So every day just to brush I'd have to bath him, wrap him in a towel, sing all his favourite nursery rhymes and very gently introduce toothbrushing so as he didn't freak out. Using a flannel first, then a soft finger brush, basically working our way up to an electric toothbrush now. We did 3 monthly dental visits with a paediatric dentist from age 1 , where he'd just sit in the chair with us while they looked at our teeth, let him have a go on the chair....just really slowly introducing the dentist so as not to be scary. Was ages before he let them look. He also has weak enamel from prematurity and so he has regular checks and prescription paste . It's really important that his teeth are properly brushed because of this.

That's the history and context of his dental needs. So they've asked him about how he can care for himself and he's said oh I still have help to brush my teeth. No more context than that as he doesn't get why really, or can't verbalise it. He has learning delays and is only functioning at the level of a 7 year old according to their own tests. So it is true....he does have help. He brushes them. But because he has the needs he has with executive functioning , dyspraxia, sensory issues, muscle tone etc he doesn't do a particularly great job. He misses bits and doesn't realise. And so once he's finished we will show him where he's missed , hand over hand go back over with him to make sure they are clean. You know, so his already weak enamel doesn't erode, as I'm sure they'd have a lot to say about that too! Doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Yet it's said in such a patronising way , he needs support to achieve independence with his personal hygiene at home. He's immature compared to his peers . Like we just aren't bothering.

Lady, if you knew the level of support and the number of years it has taken to achieve what he can now, you'd feel ashamed saying it in the way you have! Like we aren't trying. This kid sets his own alarm, gets up, makes his breakfast (except his drink as I have to add his bowel medication of a morning). He makes his bed, packs his bag, gets washed and dressed. He is outside at the time he knows the bus comes. Yes, he struggles with buttons, and brushing his hair and teeth properly. I've made uniform adaptations so he doesn't struggle changing at school and gets to practise at home, so there's no pressure or embarrassment. None of that means we aren't trying , that he isn't. It just means I cannot parent the ridiculously hypermobile fingers and dyspraxia out of him, and I can't make his progress any faster, because we are all really trying already!!

This comment along with a few others about how he's not as mature as his peers and he's less active than them has maddened me. Why we comparing him anyway? The kid has tons of issues. He's being investigated for both his legs twisting out at 40° on top of everything else and it hurts him to walk. On top of hEDS, epilepsy , autism and ADHD. I mean I'm sure you wouldn't feel like being active if you were in pain and exhausted! Give him, and us, a break!!

His school was for autistic children who were capable physically and academically , but just couldn't handle the mainstream environment, up until the year he joined. It only then became a school for children with moderate learning disabilities. And I just don't think they get him at all. They don't realise how complex his conditions make him when combined, or how it affects him. They just seem to think they can teach and we can parent it out of him . I mean they are sending him to career meetings FFS, when he's functioning at age 7! Well, he might always have some struggles. I am not underestimating him, he might fly given time....but also, he might not. And right now this is where he is at so this is where we are meeting him and gently encouraging while accepting he has limitations. I don't feel this is wrong. At least not until EHCP review time, when they word it as though it's all a parenting issue and it just makes me angry and depressed every time!

Anyway sorry for long rant. I needed to get that out!

OP posts:
ExistingonCoffee · 25/02/2026 13:04

Your views and wishes must be being collected. If that hasn’t happened, you need to raise this.

Updated advice and information shouldn’t be written in a way that is implying parental blame. Challenge that.

Support for activities of daily living and other PfA are relevant and should be covered, but not in a way that attaches blame to you.

I actually think it is brilliant the school is using a careers advisors. As long as they are specialist careers advisors. Specialist careers advisors don’t just look at careers. A good one looks at so much more such as planning next steps in education, qualifications if appropriate (right from pre-entry level upwards), PfA, interaction with the community, use of tech, transition to adult services… Many have to appeal to get such provision.

Exasperado · 25/02/2026 13:35

ExistingonCoffee · 25/02/2026 13:04

Your views and wishes must be being collected. If that hasn’t happened, you need to raise this.

Updated advice and information shouldn’t be written in a way that is implying parental blame. Challenge that.

Support for activities of daily living and other PfA are relevant and should be covered, but not in a way that attaches blame to you.

I actually think it is brilliant the school is using a careers advisors. As long as they are specialist careers advisors. Specialist careers advisors don’t just look at careers. A good one looks at so much more such as planning next steps in education, qualifications if appropriate (right from pre-entry level upwards), PfA, interaction with the community, use of tech, transition to adult services… Many have to appeal to get such provision.

It's not that I don't think it's good, it just that I feel like they don't see the reasons for why he is "immature " compared to his peers, and all of his struggles. And yes, it's the way it's written, not what it covers. We offer our views on the day of review, the paperwork is submitted a couple weeks before for us to go over. I dont think it always translates though because some of the things on there are still things that I covered last year as not being accurate, including this self care issue. It just makes me feel like we are not heard. The school aren't the best at communication tbh. Everything is via teams, I think I've set foot in the place about three times in 4 years. It just doesn't feel like they know him, or us, as well as his primary did.

OP posts:
ExistingonCoffee · 25/02/2026 13:43

You should be given the opportunity to share your views prior to the AR meeting. Not just at the meeting itself. If that hasn’t happened, you need to go back to the school, and LA if necessary, to ensure the correct process is followed.

If the updated advice and information from others isn’t accurate or is accurate but written in a way that implies parental blame, challenge it.

If the report circulated after the AR meeting isn’t accurate, you should send an email making sure your views are clear.

If the LA doesn’t amend and the EHCP is inaccurate, you will be able to appeal. Did you appeal last year?

If the LA proposes to amend, you will get the opportunity to make representations. When they finalise, if the amendments are not satisfactory, you will be able to appeal.

If you want the AR meeting to be in person, have you asked?

Are communication &/or MDTs covered in section F? If not, that is something you could look to pursue.

571a8aaaa · 27/02/2026 08:53

Just jumping on this if ok as have 2nd annual review in 2 weeks time. Ds has ot and salt and review arranged by school but they have not contacted with salt or ot for report or input?! Anyone know what best to do? I contacted salt directly who confirmed not asked

ExistingonCoffee · 27/02/2026 10:43

@571a8aaaa updated advice and information must be circulated at least 2 weeks before the meeting. If that hasn’t happened, speak to the school. This is unlikely to be a full report like you would get e.g. for a tribunal, though. You could directly ask the SALT and OT to give updated advice and information. They don’t need to wait to be asked.

Is time for updated advice and information from professionals and their attendance at AR allocated in F? If not, that is something you should look at.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page