For non-wholly independent schools, the LA must name your preference unless the LA can prove:
-The setting is unsuitable for the age, ability, aptitude or special educational needs (“SEN”) of the child or young person; or
-The attendance of the child or young person would be incompatible with the provision of efficient education for others; or
-The attendance of the child or young person would be incompatible with the efficient use of resources.
Being full is not defined in law, and for non-wholly independent schools, on its own being ‘full’ is not enough of a reason to refuse to name your preference. The LA has to prove the school is so full admitting DS is incompatible. The bar for this is higher than many LAs admit. It has to be something tangible and specific and is more than an “adverse effect”, “impact on” or “prejudicial to”. For non-wholly independent schools, the LA can, and must, name the school regardless of the school’s objections unless they can prove one of the reasons above.
Free schools are not wholly independent. They can be named against their will and can’t say they won’t accept a consultation request. If the free school could meet DS’s needs but the LA refuse to name it, you will be able to appeal when the LA finalise.
Stalling with finalising the plan will frustrate your right of appeal. Not exhaust it. If the LA breaches the deadline for finalising the EHCP, you can force them to act, via judicial review if necessary.
Are the independent schools wholly independent or section 41 independents? You only need an offer of a place for a wholly independent school. For section 41 schools, they can be named even if they object, just like a free school.
Or do you have any suitable non-maintained special schools in travelling distance (normally considered 1hr15 for secondary although some travel further) because these are not wholly independent either?
You can search for schools here. If you post where you are, someone’s problem may have suggestions.
“Access to” is vague and woolly. “Small” needs defining.
EOTAS/EOTIS is only possible if it is inappropriate for provision to be made in a school. That may not apply to you if there are schools who can meet needs, but why do you think it isn’t possible? That is a genuine question; I’m not being funny. I ask because there are often misconceptions about what EOTAS is. For example, many parents feel it wouldn’t be possible for them because they work and they wouldn’t be around to deliver the provision. However, EOTAS is not EHE. Parents cannot be compelled to organise, facilitate or deliver the provision. The LA is responsible. Another example is people often think it will be socially isolating and their DC doesn’t want that. However, it doesn’t have to be. Packages are bespoke and can include a lot of social interaction where that is appropriate.
Is other provision being made in addition to the 3 days at the PRU to ensure DC still receives a suitable full-time education? This doesn’t have to be academic provision. It could be therapeutic provision.