Go through all the reports, which should all be in K, with a fine toothcomb and highlighters.
Highlight all DC’s special educational needs in one colour and then all the provision to meet the needs in another colour. Each need should have corresponding provision.
Then go through the draft and make sure all the highlighted needs are in B and the highlighted provision is in F.
Make a note of anything the LA has omitted from the draft, any needs without corresponding provision, any woolly and vague wording, anything the reports have failed to include, and any reports the LA has failed to include.
When you go through F, look out for vague and woolly wording. For example, “access to”, “would benefit from”, “regular”, “up to”, “or equivalent”, “opportunities for”, “as appropriate”, “would be useful/helpful”, “such as”, “e.g.”, “etc.”, “as required”, “as advised”, “key adult(s)”, “small group”. Provision must be detailed, specified and quantified, otherwise the EHCP isn’t worth the paper it is written on and cannot be enforced.
When (it is a matter of when, not if) you find vague and woolly wording, check the reports to see if they are woolly and vague or whether the LA has watered down provision. If the reports are vague and woolly, ask the LA to go back to the report writers to make the reports detailed, specified and quantified. If the LA has watered down provision, request the LA stick to the wording in the reports.
Also make sure any health or social care provision that educates or trains is in F. For example, LAs like to put things like SALT, OT, physio, CBT, etc. in G (health care provision) when it belongs in F.
You get the chance to state your preferred placement.
EOTAS/EOTIS is possible if it would be inappropriate for provision to be made in a school. You will need evidence that it is inappropriate for the provision to be made in a school.
If you want to go down the personal budget route, yes, request that.
If DS is unable to attend school full time, is alternative provision in place?