When dd was little, age 3/4 she was referred to the social communication clinic.
I was verbally told she is autistic and the NHS clinic wrote a report. She had a lot of other appointments that tied in before this referral to the social comm clinic for under 5s
It concludes …. point to a diagnosis of high functioning autism.
In the actions there is a referral to a CAMHS post diagnosis group for children with autism.
There is also advice on accessing the early bird autism group
we since moved borough a few times, as out of area we didn’t get a follow up. We have other reports with feeding groups referrals etc. She’s been treated as autistic since. She’s quite classic in that people ask if she is autistic or presume she is without me saying so at groups and events. We’ve just moving area fallen between the gaps before, waiting lists are LONG.
What I never thought about at the time is the wording, points to…, there is no bit at the top of the letter saying ‘diagnosis’. It’s just a written report, pretty long, with her needs.
I was stressed at the time. I was verbally told she was autistic, went to autism support groups. The report doesn’t actually say ‘diagnosis: autism’ on it.
I’m now, ten years later, in a position where I’ve been told she doesn’t have an autism diagnosis from another local authority looking at this report.
Am I going mad? I thought being sent to multiple post diagnosis support groups, the words ‘point to a diagnosis of…’ and being told weee clear- but now I’m doubting.
I remember the end of the clinic. I was a bit shocked by the on the spot confirmation. They spent time explaining with the multiple reports from epilepsy/ salt/ nursery/ dietician/ hearing team over years it was clear. They said it twice for it to sink it. There was no doubt what they meant, but it seems to be phrased ambiguously