Well council have decided that they won't give us secondary double glazing to stop ds1 breaking windows (he's broken THREE now headbutting them) as perspex is perfectly adequate.
My main concern about perspex is that (having seen it used a temporary measure at a friend's house) is that you can't see through it possibly. Being able to look out of the street at the cars is very important to ds1- if he can't this is likely to lead to repeated headbanging - so instead of an occasional headbang from frustration - I'm going to get repeated headbanging- and even if the perspex stand sup I'm not sure his head will.
So am ready to write the letter pointing out 1) why perspex is not suitable 2) that as a child he is entitled to a non-means tested disabled facilities grant of up to 25 grand and this is well within this range and 3) that we want to keep him at home for a long as possible but that if we are to do this is is essential that the LA support us in this. Will also point out that I began this process almost a year before any windows were broken and it is a) their incompetence that has led to them being broken and b) extremely fortunate that ds1 has not hurt himself.
Will copy to MP and counsellors.
But if anyone has any advice on who I can threaten them with (local government ombudsmen????) or any info on where I might find info about DFGs. Is there some sort of time limit for example???