I applied for DLA several months ago for dd, and various things have held up their decision.
I rang them on Friday to tell them that dd had been given a Major buggy from wheelchair services, and the guy on the other end of the phone went quiet. He then told me that they had already decided that dd wasn't going to get DLA, and put me through to someone else who read out the medical evidence etc. and I can see why she didn't get it!
The report was a load of rubbish. They said that her Piedro boots helped her to walk as well as any other child (so THAT'S why she was offered a proper wheelchair rather than a Major buggy then? Also, the boots only help her ankles and NOT her knees and hips that are also extremely hypermobile, prone to dislocate and are unstable because of her condition).
They made out that her heart problems were minor and insignificant. (So THAT's why her lips turn blue and she is too exhausted to walk or even go to nursery a lot of the time?)
They even argued that dd didn't have eczema! I had only put this down in the "other medical problems" bit, but as dd was diagnosed with eczema as a baby, and we have got prescribed creams here from a very recent flare-up... hmmm.
Her condition isn't as severe as some, but I thought she would at least be entitled to lower/middle rate care, and lower rate mobility too from the criteria I've seen. They based their decision on reports from people that barely see her, because the consultants didn't bother to reply.
I know this topic has probably been covered several times before, but I wondered if anyone else's claim has been rejected recently, and whether anyone has got any advice for me? I am going to appeal...
S xx