Hi everyone,
This is my first post, so hope I do it all right. Sorry this is long!
My DS is 4 and has a private diagnosis of autism. We went down the private route as my LA is notorious for having an appallingly long wait time for an NHS diagnosis and we wanted to know where we were at before my DS went to school.
We started the NHS pathway over a year ago and since then we have had a single triage type appointment with a consultant paediatrician, nothing else, no speech, no OT. I have chased and complained and this week was told that as we have a private diagnosis (they know this from our EHCP Request) we cannot continue with the NHS diagnosis pathway and we will be removed as we are 'taking up space that someone else could use'. Leaving aside the issue that this is not (or shouldn't be) a means tested system, they are also saying that they will not confirm that the private diagnosis we have will be accepted as the equivalent of an NHS one. They say there is no need to do this as we'll have access to provision.
We continued on the NHS pathway as we know that many LAs will not accept a private diagnosis and at the time believed that included or own. We have zero faith that our current LA will not try and pull something later. They are already seeking to move towards diagnosis being carried out by schools and gps only, reflecting a move by lots of SW London boroughs. We cannot see why they won't accept and confirm that the private diagnosis will be accepted by them. They just say that we will have access to provision (although all they cite is the early bird course). I'm nervous about removing my son from a pathway on the whim of a paediatrician who seems annoyed that we have a private diagnosis. Also, what if we ever need to move? But I'm wondering if there is any benefit in having the NHS diagnosis as well. Our thinking is that it gives us certainty, especially if we do ever have to move. Our son has a life-long disability and I am very wary about doing anything that will prevent him from accessing any help he may be entitled to. I have zero faith that this is not just a cynical exercise in reducing waiting lists with a nasty shock waiting for us somewhere down the line.
Sorry for the ramble. I just wondered if anyone else had experienced this and if I'm overreacting or right to be cautious about stopping the NHS pathway without any real assurances as to our private diagnosis. Also if, as we currently intend to do, we fight them on this, what we can show may be the detriment in not having the NHS diagnosis.
If you still are, thank you for listening!