Thanks for the links and info. First, apologies: I should have said International Schools, not Indy schools. Well, both, but you get my drift! Therefore, no ECHP or similar. There is someone in a SENCO-esque role at the school but they're a little useless and also more of a counselling role as opposed to SEN. I'll have support from co-workers who are excellent teachers but none specifically trained in AEN.
I met with the parents and child and really had the final say on if he would be admitted to the school. However, it was made clear to me by the Primary Head that as the middle of 5 children, the family will make a big difference to the school's income. It's a great school and very, very well funded but we don't have a waiting list and are at about 85% capacity. I've contacted the previous teacher but they're in a different country. I'm waiting for a reply.
I do have observations and assessments from specific bodies (don't want to be too specific which ones) but they are so dry and clinical. x was observed. the child tended to y. It was recording behaviour as opposed to managing it, if you see what I mean.
The child will have a 1-2-1 TA. I've known her for a year and she's good but not used to the particular role. I think she'll be great but they're (both of them) my responsibility.
Thanks again for the useful advice. I'm not entirely sure what I was asking. Every child is different and there's no one size fits all approach but there are general approaches which can help many.
Finally zzzz. Thanks for the multiple, helpful posts.
"You sound a little uncommitted to inclusion for this child, based on his diagnosis? Why is that?"
I am absolutely committed to the child making the most of their time whilst in my charge. Academically predominantly (that's my job), but to help them get the most out of their year, they need other support. Basic example, they aren't going to learn anything from me if they don't understand the instructions of if they don't like an aspect of my behaviour.
I think inclusion has benefits for all children. Those who may be excluded for reasons like autism but also those who don't have the same struggles so can learn a lot from mixing with others. However, I don't think others' education should be sacrificed in the name of inclusion. Many years ago I had a very disruptive child in my class. He didn't have a diagnosis then and I don't know what it would have been anyway. I didn't have the strategies or support to help him cope in mainstream education and the other children in the class underperformed by (completely qualitative) 30%. I think I would do better now with decades of experience but I still think that the rest of the class would achieve significantly less due to his presence.
I didn't come here to start arguing though. I have AIBU for that!
I'm in my twilight years of teaching. I've been a head and SMT but am now a class teacher and nothing more. My politics or educational ideas can take a back seat. I get given 16 (yes, Indy school remember!) children and spend a year doing my best for them before passing the baton. FWIW, this child does seem to cope with mainstream education.
Thanks all. I'm sure I'll be back to the forum with specific questions.