*I want a graduate slt to go in once a week. Not a specialist ta. Qualified as in "has a degree" in slt
Been told that's never going to be possibility.*
They lied.
Nice of them to give you these bits of evidence for you to record in writing - you know the drill, emails saying 'thank you for your call today explaining that no-one gets a qualified SALT in school, not OT unless they were so physically disabled as to require a wheelchair. That has been a helpful clarifiaction'
And into the bundle it goes.
I'm not sure if you are on the dc who needs the statement enforced, or on a new statement/ehcp that you are trying to get put in a s final so you can appeal it.
Either way it is useful evidence.
PLEASE everyone reading this, stop assuming that a statement that is not getting implemented is a matter for LA complaints procedure or LGO.
PLEASE instead go straight for Judicial Review ideally via legal aid in the name of the child. If none of the firms that do legal aid will proceed without you going through the complaints/LGO then fair enough, but there is an option (or there was an option when this came up for a relative several years ago) for saying that you can skip the complaints phases when it is something urgent for a child, and of course lost time for a child's education cannot be recovered.
There are also pro bono law centres who might put a JR together.
For some LAs, a solicitor's letter into the LA legal department tend to have a laxative effect on them, and the blockage of the SEN department is removed