But school thinks the LA will say he isn't far enough behind.
School is in a dream world on this one.
The law makes no mention of 'being far enough behind'.
The question is: what are Dc's difficulties, and what provision is needed for the best possible outcomes.
I am hearing more and more of this 'making progress in very small steps'.
Well it is usually rubbish. dc is getting older and as such will make progress in very small steps even if he was sitting in the mainstream class with no support at all. Just because he is maturing he will make small steps.
If he were making no progress or if he were going backwards, that would ring massive alarm bells.
One question - is he slipping further and further behind his peers? My dc made progress year on year, but her peers were progressing much faster, so she was slipping back relative to them.
The questions in the law are about 'satisfactory progress', and this is relative to what he could be achieving with the right support.
So maybe go through all the recommendations in the reports.
Make a list and get an understanding from the school as to who is dealing with which thing, how they are doing it, how long for and how often.
And have a think about whether the interventions are directed very much at school subjects (schools often do this), when really his needs are quite different - eg social skills, organisation skills, attention, sensory issues, physical things like holding a pen, ie the sorts of things most kids donot need to be taught but your dc does.
Schools don't always want to support EHCPs as they fear their future careers will be affected if they ask for money from the LA.
If you think High School will be a problem without a clear EHCP, you are probably right. And time is still on your side. Just.
Good Luck