We got the proposed statement for my daughter who has Autism and she will start reception in Sept 2015. We asked for our three choices to be the two ASD Resource Bases in our county and a mainstream with a good reputation for supporting kids with ASD.
My daughter's officer rang today to say the first panel had turned down our application for the base on the basis that 'she does not currently meet the indicators.' I asked her if it means she is performing at too low a level and she said yes. She turned 4 in Oct and scores less than half her age in all areas except one. She also has sensory processing issues. I visited our preferred unit and spoke to the head of the unit informally and was told she kind of meets the profile of the children there.
What I really struggle to believe is that they recommend that we leave her in the primary school attached to the nursery she attends, for a year, in mainstream, with a TA 25 hrs/week and then see if she has moved on from there in a year's time with a view to apply for a place on the base then. Huge gamble and I don't feel that my daughter would progress in mainstream (she's been going full time to nursery for a year and a half or more with very small progress.)
Where does that leave me? Appeal or special school? Does the LEA have a duty to show me the paperwork related to the meeting where they took that decision, and all the specific criteria that my daughter should have met but haven't?
Do they have to offer me mainstream and not special school? I am very stressed about this and want to make the right decision. Part of me wants to appeal but really, really confused, about the difference between one and another. If I go down the special school route, is the LEA likely to fight it as much as they have fought the unit idea? Can I choose one outside of our city? And what exactly is the difference between a good special school and a resource unit? Thanks!