we are appealing parts 2 and 3 of dds statement. she attend ms primary and has complex needs. we attended sendist hearing last month that was adjourned until September. The judge has ordered that all of the provision that was agreed at yhe hearing needs to be in place for dd at the beginning of September.
the LA agreed to -
dd needs 26.75 of TA hours. This will be on a 1:1 basis.
This is now agreed within the working document.
my dd curently has access to a TA that is employed predominantly for her (with her statement funding) yet doesnt always work with her on a 1:1 basis, and only works for 21 hrs a week.
I have emailed the HT asking her to confirm that from september dd will have 26.75 hours of 1:1 from TA. I also explained that as the panel made clear at the hearing if dd is going to be part of small group work she must have 1:1 within that group.
Am I expecting to much for this to actually happen?
school seem to think so. the HT has not replied to my email, instead yhe senco (la witness) called and left a voicemail to say she will be calling me on monday about my email.
the Ht hasnt even acknowledged the email.
I am getting the impression that they wont put it into writing but are going to tell me that dd will have 1:1 at yhe discretion of the TA.
is this acceptable?