at your name in a thread title Bluebear (anything to oblige!!)
Yes, I was very surprised that our case is being presented at York. It is to do with the fact that ds2 carries an extra copy of the IG1F gene our research geneticist has always suspected has been involved with overgrowth, but in other cases there have always been other changes which have meant that they couldnt exactly pinpoint the IG1F gene as being responsible for growth or something like that. Apparently ds2 and his aunt have a `pure' change??
We are working with two very impressive lady geneticists at the moment, which is wonderful. They are super knowledgable, confident and inspire an awful lot of confidence. It is just rather a shame that we weren't exposed to their expertise before ds2 came on the scene (find that hard to say really, but tis true)
There have been a couple of woolly excuses about the change not being picked up by CVS test along the line of....well, these tests are normally eyeballed and it depends on the expertise of the individual and if it had been done at St.Georges rather than Kings it might have been a different story
Anyhow, we are mega busy moving house atm, but once that one is ticked off, we are going to probably take it further.
It is such a difficult one...because in one way I am saying I'd rather that ds2 hadnt been born (life would have been so much easier and ds1's life would have been more plain sailing)..but on the other hand I look at dear little (or big!!) ds2 and think I'm his mother - how can I wish that he wasnt here. Then all of a sudden I see a glimpse of the future and think..OMG if ds2 needs lifelong care, then I want him to get the very best..and if there has been `medical negligence' and he were to receive some sort of compensation it would go to securing his future.
Rambling now...
Anyhow, thanks about the Unique suggestion. It has been mentioned to me before, but I had forgotten about them. I think I might give them a call now we have a clear diagnosis.
Hope you are all ok.