Ladies, I knew it was coming, this Ed Psych wrote an amazing (and I do mean amazing) report about dd1 (Dyslexic).
I approached her regarding assessment of dd2 (?ASD) which I've been mulling over to get an idea of dd2's actual cognitive strengths and weaknesses as dd2 has an IEP, makes slow progress in literacy and numeracy, can sometimes be exceedingly bright and at other times fail to tackle even the most basic of tasks for school. dd2 finds reading comprehension difficult and needs visual prompts and 'always' (SENCO) needs adult involvement to start her work at school. SENCO very much on board and seeing problems with social interaction, processing, anxiety and attention.
EP is old school and gave the distinct impression a while ago that I was bonkers to even think dd2 may have ASD and because she met dd2 briefly and dd2 was polite and made good eye contact.
FFWD to today's cognitive assessment and subsequent meeting with EP, me and SENCO. EP (despite me saying I was merely interested a profile of cognitive strengths and weaknesses) spent most of it tilting her head and emphasising what wonderful eye contact dd2 made and how socially appropriate she was.
I am sure, however, her report will be useful. EP was actually quite complimentary re dd2's skills, identified mostly in the normal/superior range, just processing issues. Which again leads me to question why the heck does she need all this support at school?
Caring Carrot 1: Handywoman 0
I'm off for one of these 