Please or to access all these features

SN children

Here are some suggested organisations that offer expert advice on special needs.

draft SEN 0-25 CoP is out now

21 replies

chocnomore · 04/10/2013 13:47

www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-0-to-25-special-educational-needs-sen-code-of-practice-draft-regulations

OP posts:
zumbaleena · 04/10/2013 19:08

thanks so much! am going to study this tonight as I hit the bed! important stuff

lougle · 04/10/2013 19:29

Thank you!

lougle · 04/10/2013 19:48

Hmm...interesting.

Pg 92 of the draft Code:

"A local authority must conduct an assessment of education, health and care needs and prepare an Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan when it considers that it may be necessary for special educational provision to be made for the child or young person through an EHC plan."

Note the change of wording from 'probably' to 'may'. I would say that 'may' is a lower burden of proof than 'probably'. What do you all think?

lougle · 04/10/2013 19:50

Also, the scope for 'referral' for an EHCP is 'anyone' - even a family friend. Although it says that permission should be given, it's not a must. Interesting, again.

lougle · 04/10/2013 19:55

They've also shaved 6 weeks off the process:

"The whole assessment and planning process, from the point an assessment is requested or that a child or young person is brought to the LA’s attention until the final EHC plan is issued, must take no more than 20 weeks (subject to exemptions set out below)."

It's currently 26 weeks.

lougle · 04/10/2013 20:01

Hmm....Page 102 - Decision not to issue EHCP. Looks like it's a lot more wooly than the Note in Lieu - no obligation to provide evidence unless it's requested of the LA. Only has to give 'reasons for its decision.'

lougle · 04/10/2013 20:02

Page 103:

"Where a young person or parent is seeking an unusual or alternative way to receive their support services – particularly through a personal budget, but not exclusively so – then the planning process must include consideration of those solutions."

Opening the door for ABA?

lougle · 04/10/2013 20:04

Not too happy about pg. 104 - SEN must be included, but health care needs only should be included - this is the problem with the Part 6/Part 3 saga in Statementing.

nennypops · 04/10/2013 21:52

Not too happy about pg. 104 - SEN must be included, but health care needs only should be included - this is the problem with the Part 6/Part 3 saga in Statementing.

That just reflects what is in the Children and Families Bill. It's utterly stupid, but it would need the Bill to be changed. I think IPSEA are lobbying the House of Lords for that purpose but aren't too optimistic.

nennypops · 04/10/2013 21:55

A local authority must conduct an assessment of education, health and care needs and prepare an Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan when it considers that it may be necessary for special educational provision to be made for the child or young person through an EHC plan."

Note the change of wording from 'probably' to 'may'. I would say that 'may' is a lower burden of proof than 'probably'. What do you all think?

Seems to me that the important word is "must" in the first line: i.e., even if they only think it may be necessary for provision to be made, they still must do the assessment.

lougle · 04/10/2013 21:57

I was at a Select Committee yesterday and asked whether access to health assessments would be easier, in line with the new requirement on CCGs to commission health services specified in EHCPs. The answer was, basically, no .

lougle · 04/10/2013 21:58

Yes, nennypops, but in the last Code it was 'probably'. The point I was making is that this seems to be a positive shift, to me. Probably is a stronger word than may, so I would think more assessments would go through if regard is given to the new code.

nennypops · 04/10/2013 22:02

Yup, that's what I was saying, lougie.

bjkmummy · 05/10/2013 08:32

Part3/6 - the new code does make specific reference that salt is an educational need and old case law stands so should make it easier to stop the la trying the trick of salt in part 6 and the LA will ne clear that no tribunal will stand for that trick any more. For me the fact they have out sencos to. D qualified teachers is progress as my local academy has a senco who is the principals wife and not a teacher. They have just published a leaflet saying no kids with asd will get a place in the unit there - very naughty

StarlightMcKenzie · 05/10/2013 11:35

I don't think ABA has any more chance. Consideration must be given, as is the case now. However LAs can make judgements based in their opinion rather than evidence, as they do now.

Also, most LAs are feeding back that parents are finding personal budgets too difficult to manage, yet those LAs reporting that as fact haven't actually given any families personal budgets to manage.

The system is going to contine to rely on the opinions and political agenda of those building LA Empires.

LuvMyBoyz · 05/10/2013 14:32

Bjk: SENCOs are meant to be teachers at the moment, too. All the local Academy has to do is give a teacher the title of SENCO but continue to allow the principal's wife to carry out the role. I know of a primary where the person who does all the SENCO role is a level 3 TA but her line manager Deputy has the title. Lots of this goes on and I can't see the new CoP changing it.

JIAR · 17/10/2013 10:57

Just seen this useful summary of the SEN Code of Practice: www.mencap.org.uk/campaigns/what-we-campaign-about/children-and-young-people/special-educational-needs-code-practice. Hope it's useful for everyone!

TOWIELA · 17/10/2013 15:19

The clause below makes me very very nervous. I still cannot see how you can mediate a child's special educational needs. Mediation for divorcing warring couples, yes. A child's education, no. Although I appreciate that the code says the mediator has to be independent. But it doesn't explicitly state who will be paying for these mediation services (unless I missed it?).

I can see this mediation clause being yet another thing LAs will use to beat a parent over the head with. One by delaying-tactic layer. One more layer to scare a parent off.

___

"The Children and Families Bill sets out that parents and young people may only make an appeal to the SEND Tribunal after they have contacted an independent mediation adviser. The Code states that this is in order to “provide an opportunity to resolve disagreements before an appeal to the Tribunal”. Mediation must be considered before registering an appeal, but that “once the information has been provided [by the mediation adviser], it is for the parent or young person to decide whether they want to go to mediation”. A certificate will be issued –either within 3 working days of the end of mediation, if the parent or young person wishes to proceed, or within 3 working days of a decision not to go through mediation.

The Code states that a local authority must include a notice about mediation when informing parents of a decision that can be appealed to the Tribunal. The Code states that the parents and young people receive about mediation “should not seek to pressure them into going to mediation”. If a parent or young person wishes to appeal, they must contact a mediation adviser within 2 months and the adviser will “provide information on mediation and answer any questions which the parent or young person may have”. The Code states that the exception to this is in appeals specifically about the name of the school or institution named on an EHCP, the type of school or institution named on an EHCP, or if no school or institution is named on an EHCP.

The mediator must be independent which the Code defines as being someone who is not “directly employed by a local authority” and should be accredited. The Code says that they “should be ready to answer any questions from the parent or young person and explain that mediation is an informal, non-legalistic, dispute settlement process run by a trained third party and designed to bring two parties together to clarify the issues, and reach a resolution”. “Reasonable” travel costs and “other expenses” will be paid to the parent or young person by the local authority"

lougle · 17/10/2013 16:23

The process is clear:

Refusal to assess/maintain,etc.
|
Consider mediation by contacting independent mediation service.

|--> Mediation agreed as route|->Mediation|--->certificate
|-->Mediation rejected by parents|-->certificate

Certificate-> tribunal.

TOWIELA · 17/10/2013 20:41

Yes, a clear process but yet another hoop for the parent to jump through. The process to a Statement is clear now but look how LAs bend and ignore the existing law! I can just imagine LAs telling parents (incorrectly) that they HAVE to go through with mediation.

Nerfmother · 17/10/2013 21:43

Look at the bit about contacting parent after a SA request is made - as soon as is practicable? Is currently something like 29 days for views.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page