I requested SA for my dd about 3 weeks ago, in the letter I wrote I stated how the school weren't meeting dds needs. I kept the letter very factual, based on evidence from salt and OT reports etc.
the lea have now written to me asking for my opinions on the provision already provided by the school. I am going to write back saying how the provision provided doesn't meet dds needs etc but I am thinking of including that despite OT recommending dd has 1:1 the head teacher has told me the school can't fund this.
But would I then be shooting myself in the foot? As the lea might say no SA is needed school can fund 15 hours 1:1, but my problem is without the legality of a statement school won't provide this.
I'm confused if this is a tactic used by the lea to say my evidence is based on my opinions, not facts.
Should I just repeat what I've written in my first letter using quotes from reports etc or give my opinions?
Thanks