Some background - I'm appealing ds' statement (parts 2, 3 and 4).
- School has said they can't meet his needs but LA have named them. Apparently a panel has decided the provision is "stunning".
- Ds is in MS attending PT outside the classroom, and has done so for over 5 months. His attendance is 50%.
- We had a multidisciplinary care review and the meeting notes show school, OT and Psych said he needs SS.
- Meeting notes also show Psych thinks ds is school refusing because I'm letting him make all the decisions, which are not age-appropriate for him to make. Mum is the adult and should decide.
- EP having read the notes, said she agrees and wonders how mum will respond. (found all this out after I requested ds's school records)
- EP says the cause is anxiety and mum should have addressed it by using the photocopied generic sheets on anxiety.
And Inappropriatelyemployed will like this one
- I had asked for no information to be shared, and everyone agreed, and they still did it! On one of the emails, it even mentioned, "should we be sharing as mum has asked for no info to be shared" 
So the upshot is, at this multi-disciplinary meeting, I will be challenged on these grounds:
I'm a crap mum
- who's letting ds decide whether to go to school
- I haven't cured his anxiety by carrying out the exercises on the sheets the EP doled out (which I know she hasn't read because I referred to one and she admitted she hadn't read it)
- who let his sister stay at home for 3 years without going to school so ds wants to do the same (dd is a whole other story)
Thank you for reading, and I would be grateful for any tips 