It is that time again, year end reports are coming home.
Bee's came today, and she is on a fully modified programme, which means she is not measured in any way against the Y2 curriculum, but instead against the goals specifically laid out in her IEP.
So, her report has no "grades" on it, per se - just (extensive) comments about how she is with relation to the goals set out for her in her modified, alternative expectations and goals.
However, around here, there is a stupid trend to "Pay for A's". A - a mark higher than 80%, consistently exceeding Provincial curriculum standards - will earn you something special if you take your year end report to certain shops... a free comic book, a slice of pizza, a movie rental...
I know that there are children who can roll out of bed in the morning and sleep through class, then write a test and ace it (I was one of them). I also know that there are children who fight tooth and nail and study hours every night, and getting a 65% on a test is a massive achievement.
It bothers me that children like Bee will not have a chance to even be acknowledged because their reports look like they have accomplished nothing. There is no grade awarded for finally, after 4 years of work, being able to try and write your name in a manner that someone who already knows "what" they are trying to read can see it... there is no A+ for the child who has finally learned to steady their hand long enough that they can put a spoon full of custard into their own mouth and wear only half of it. These kids fight so hard, and I am staring at another report that just adds bricks to the wall separating her from her peers.
So what do you think - it this "Pay for A's" fair, or does it pay homage to those who only succeed in the "traditional" sense? Does it further elevate the "naturally talented" on their pedestals or just teach those who don't earn that recognition that they didn't qualify, and that's that?
It's been a long, challenging day - maybe it IS just me...