Please or to access all these features

'This Is My Child': our long-planned campaign on children with additional needs

19 replies

RowanMumsnet · 10/06/2013 12:51

Hello

As some of you will remember, we started this thread a few months back to get your input about a possible campaign around children with additional needs.

The thread was hugely informative - thanks very much to everyone who gave their views. Many of you were asking for a broadly-focused campaign encompassing visible and non-visible disabilities among children, teenagers and adults, and across many platforms (poster advertisements, television campaigns and so on). Much as we'd like to do this sort of thing in an ideal world, realistically we're bound by the resources that are available to us. We've also found, over the years, that campaigns with a very specific focus can do much better than those with more general messages. In addition, we're mindful that many of the big campaigning organisations in this space have already undertaken more general awareness-raising campaigns to do with capacities and needs of people with disabilities, and we try not to re-invent the wheel (although we're always happy to add our voice to such campaigns when asked).

So we've decided to go with an awareness-raising campaign focused on the ways in which caring for a child with additional needs can change a family's life, and the myths about disability that can have negative impacts on such children and their carers. We're going to call it This Is My Child (again, thanks for all the input) as we think it's simple, arresting and suits the aims of the campaign best.

We're going to be addressing myths like:

MYTH: children with behavioural disabilities are just naughty and need a firm hand
MYTH: people in receipt of disability-related payments are likely to be 'scroungers'
MYTH: children with additional needs in mainstream schooling are drawing resources and attention away from other children
MYTH: it's easy to get a Blue Badge and mobility vehicles
MYTH: a non-expert can accurately judge the capacities and potential of a child with additional needs

We're going to be putting up a myth-busting page (similar to our We Believe You myth-buster here) which will be heavily featured across the site and promoted from our social media accounts, hopefully with some mainstream press coverage. We're also going to be featuring guest blogs on the topic and holding an event on Twitter using the hashtag #thisismychild; watch this space for details.

There are a few things we'd really like your help with:

  1. Do let us have suggestions for myths you'd like busted (there's a limit to how many we can do, but it would be great to hear your thoughts).
  2. Do you have any Top Tips for how to deal with situations in which you - particularly as a parent or carer - have been subject to ignorant or hostile responses from members of the public when out and about with your child? We'd love to put together a list of ninja ways to defuse, inform or simply get rid.
  3. To go with the 'This Is My Child' theme, we're asking for MNers who are parents of or carers for children with additional needs to send in pictures of their child, which we will use for a photo gallery on the site. These can be completely anonymous and needn't be linked to your RL or MN name if you'd rather not; the idea is to personalise the issue for members of the public. If you'd be up for doing this, do please send in a digital photo (a roughly 500-pixel-sized image in a jpg, gif or png format) along with a caption (which can be pretty much anything you please: 'This is my child. He's eight and he loves Star Wars' - that sort of thing) to [email protected], with the subject heading 'This Is My Child, FAO Campaigns Team'.

Thanks for reading this far - as ever, do please let us know what you think.

RowanMumsnet · 11/06/2013 08:55

Morning everyone

Thanks so much for all of these - there are some brilliant ideas here

Any more tips for dealing with unenlightened members of the general public?

RowanMumsnet · 11/06/2013 11:50

@bialystockandbloom

MNHQ do you mean tips for families of SN children on dealing with the public?

Or tips for the 'general public' on how to approach families with SN children?

I think the latter is the crucial thing, and would fit in with the campaign.

We did actually initially mean the former (following a couple of reports of a thread a few weeks back in which the brother of a child with SN had been put in the position of needing techniques to 'defend' his brother, who was being subject to some abuse by other children) - it was suggested to us that we might want to collect coping strategies for these situations.

However, tips for the 'general public' on how to behave like a civilised human would also be good - fire away!

RowanMumsnet · 13/06/2013 13:13

Thanks again for all of these

And thanks also to those of you who've sent in photos - they're gorgeous. We'd love to have some more.

To save your scrolling fingers, here's the relevant bit from the OP:

'To go with the 'This Is My Child' theme, we're asking for MNers who are parents of or carers for children with additional needs to send in pictures of their child, which we will use for a photo gallery on the site. These can be completely anonymous and needn't be linked to your RL or MN name if you'd rather not; the idea is to personalise the issue for members of the public. If you'd be up for doing this, do please send in a digital photo (a roughly 500-pixel-sized image in a jpg, gif or png format) along with a caption (which can be pretty much anything you please: 'This is my child. He's eight and he loves Star Wars' - that sort of thing) to [email protected], with the subject heading 'This Is My Child, FAO Campaigns Team'.'

Thanks all Flowers

RowanMumsnet · 13/06/2013 17:45

@r3dh3d

When you say 500 pixels, do you mean actually 500 pixels? Or 500 x 500 pixels? Because 500 pixels is teeny-tiny.

Um. Let me ask a grown up NancyMumsnet

RowanMumsnet · 14/06/2013 09:26

@TapselteerieO

I sent a photo, but I have no idea what size it was, because I copied it from FB onto my ipad then sent it and it didn't tell me a size... Sorry.

I think we have it Tapsel - it's lovely, thank you!

RowanMumsnet · 14/06/2013 09:42

@r3dh3d

When you say 500 pixels, do you mean actually 500 pixels? Or 500 x 500 pixels? Because 500 pixels is teeny-tiny.

Right, NancyMumsnet says:

Don't worry too much about exact dimensions. If a picture is 500x600, I don't want people to think 'oh no!

500x500 is a good sort of size for MN but that makes it a perfect square which most photos aren't, which is fine.

So if you can aim at roughly 500x500, or 600x400 (or 400x600 if it's portrait!) - or something in that region - that would be grand.

And if you're not sure what size it is, please do send it in anyway - we might be able to resize it here.

RowanMumsnet · 14/06/2013 09:43

@StarlightMcKenzie

I can do the photo thing, but not the pixel thing. I have no idea what that means sorry.

Please do Starlight - if you're not sure, we'd love you to send it anyway.

HelenMumsnet · 17/06/2013 09:43

Morning. Huge apologies for our non-appearance on this thread. That's, frankly, embarrassing: we should have been here yesterday.

Unusually for us, there weren't very many of us around this weekend so we're just catching up with what's happened. It does sound, though, as if we could have handled the situation better.

We'll post again as soon as we've got a handle on stuff.

HelenMumsnet · 17/06/2013 11:57

OK. We have (almost) got to grips with the cafe thread now. And we have posted to make it very clear that we do not tolerate posts that are disablist in tone and intent.

We've also said at that it's clear that the This Is My Child campaign has much to do in terms of raising awareness and extending tolerance of children with special needs.

HelenMumsnet · 17/06/2013 12:36

@ArbitraryUsername

Thanks Helen. I bet you could do with some gin by now. Grin

Thank you. I might have had some already... Blush

HelenMumsnet · 17/06/2013 12:55

@gimmeanaxe

Perhaps the 'This is my child' campaign shouldnt be hidden away on the SN section where non-sn people rarely, if ever, venture.

It won't be. This is just the "heads-up" thread, gimmeanaxe.

HelenMumsnet · 17/06/2013 15:29

Just a reminder, folks, that personal attacks are against our Talk Guidelines - and will be deleted.

HelenMumsnet · 17/06/2013 15:55

@Eyesunderarock

Confused OK, naming someone is a personal attack?

Yes, if it's to criticise them/accuse them. Even if the accusation/criticism is true.

So I may be the vilest fattest cow of all time but to post "HelenMN is a vile fat cow" would break the site rules.

HelenMumsnet · 17/06/2013 16:10

@Eyesunderarock

OK, but my post contained no insults or criticism, and I'm sorry if you thought that it did.

Well, as we read it, you were responding to tabulahrasa's posts that said "there are actually people that I might pass in the street who think that's it's entirely reasonable that a mother with a child with a disability shouldn't use a service in case that disability mildly inconveniances some other people" and "In fact it's worse than that...one of them was a teacher" - and in doing so you named another poster as the poster tabulahrasa was probably thinking of, therefore implying that those were her (the named poster's) views.

HelenMumsnet · 17/06/2013 16:12

@tabulahrasa

Well without naming any posters - even if it was purely to say I didn't know if that was them or not. Hmm

I suddenly realised that people who thought that children with a disability that involves a noise should be removed from a cafe in case their disability upsets others could not just be a passerby or a neighbour, but could be teaching my children.

I maybe should have added or their dentist or other professions - but it just didn't occur to me to do that. The point I was trying to make is that anyone could have those views and I'd never know, not that I was accusing or criticising any particular poster.

Your post was only deleted tabulahrasa because it contained a C&P of a deleted post. You'll see that our deletion message says, "Replies may also be deleted"

RowanMumsnet · 19/06/2013 10:13

Hello all

Thanks again for the input (including the criticisms - we are reading it all, honest).

We just wanted to let you know that we're aiming to launch this in early July; please watch this space for more details.

And please do keep sending in your photos - we've had quite a few now (and hopefully those who've sent will have had a reply from us!) but we'd love to have some more.

RowanMumsnet · 19/06/2013 11:04

Cuteness is brilliant, but non-cuteness (however defined) is also both brilliant and welcome.

As we said below, we do know that this campaign isn't comprehensive. (You can see more in the OP about how and why we came to the plan that we have.) But we do hope that an effective awareness-raising campaign of this kind would have a ripple effect, making the broader population question their ingrained responses to physical, behavioural or cognitive 'difference' among all age groups.

We're certainly going to be including some 'myths' that apply to a much broader group of people than 'cute kids'.

RowanMumsnet · 24/06/2013 16:34

@bochead

bump

why isn't this stickied?

Sorry, we lost our sticky there - not sure why! We've re-stickied it now.

RowanMumsnet · 16/08/2013 15:22

Hello hello

Do please come and have a look over here

Grin

Thanks SO MUCH for everyone's input on this

Watch this thread for updates

Tap "Watch" to get all the latest updates

End of posts

There are no more MNHQ posts on this thread