I've been reading this thread with interest. I think there is cause for concern.
Salondon you say
"Stardust isn?t able to discuss the trial openly because she doesn?t want to jeopardise someone else's research."
There are ways of discussing these matters without alluding to a trial and then refusing to discuss it on an open talk board. In fact, I think this is a worrying thing, to ask people to contact off board if they want further information. The information either is open to the public or it isn't.
I wonder if it would work anyway. As another poster has said, there would need to be 'damage' for it to work. Is ASD the result of 'damage' or simply the result of 'alternative networking' in the brain? The jury is out, I believe.
If ASD is a result of 'alternative networking' from birth, then there is no 'damage' to fix, although there are certain elements that prevent a person with ASD from accessing successfully the society within which we live.
Huge ethical issues there.
My DD has a brain 'malformation.' That means that although her brain is not 'right' or 'typical' it's likely that the different structure of her brain has been present from birth. There is no 'damage' to fix.